BlackRock Capital Allocation Term (BCAT) vs HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital (HASI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital (HASI) has outperformed BlackRock Capital Allocation Term (BCAT) over the past year, gaining 18.2% versus a loss of 7.1%. Over five years, BCAT leads with a -29.2% price change compared with -37.8% for HASI. HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital is the larger company by market cap ($4.67 billion vs $1.46 billion), about 3.2 times the size.
On valuation, BlackRock Capital Allocation Term trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.7x vs 55.9x for HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital). HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital pays a dividend yielding 4.65%, while BlackRock Capital Allocation Term does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BCAT | HASI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.77 | $36.35 |
| Market cap | $1.46B | $4.67B |
| 1-day change | +0.44% | -0.60% |
| YTD return | -2.75% | +15.65% |
| 1-year return | -7.09% | +18.21% |
| 5-year return | -29.20% | -37.80% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.74 | 55.92 |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.90 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.40 | $0.65 |
| Dividend yield | 21.80% | 4.65% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.69 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $400.50M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +4.41% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $184.55M |
| Net margin | — | 46.08% |
| 52-week high | $16.20 | $44.13 |
| 52-week low | $13.43 | $27.28 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.00% | -17.63% |
| Analyst consensus | — | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | — | +36.75% |
| Average volume | 898.14K | 1.02M |
| Shares outstanding | 106.28M | 128.50M |
| Employees | — | 170 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital is about 3.2 times larger than BlackRock Capital Allocation Term by market value ($4.67B vs $1.46B).
- HASI has outperformed BCAT by 25.3 percentage points over the past year.
- HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital trades at a higher earnings multiple (55.9x vs 5.7x trailing P/E).
- BlackRock Capital Allocation Term offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (21.80% vs 4.65%).
About HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital
HASI stock →HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the investment in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other sustainable infrastructure markets in the United States. The company's portfolio includes equity investments, receivables, and debt securities.
Finance · Finance/Investors Services · 170 employees
BCAT vs HASI FAQ
Which is bigger, BlackRock Capital Allocation Term or HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital?
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital (HASI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.67B compared with $1.46B for BlackRock Capital Allocation Term (BCAT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BCAT or HASI?
HASI returned +18.21% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.09% for BCAT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BCAT or HASI?
BCAT has the lower trailing P/E at 5.7, versus 55.9 for HASI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BlackRock Capital Allocation Term or HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital?
BlackRock Capital Allocation Term has the higher yield at 21.80%, compared with 4.65% for HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital.
Are BlackRock Capital Allocation Term and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.