MetaCap

Bloom Energy (BE) vs Keysight Technologies (KEYS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Bloom Energy (BE) has outperformed Keysight Technologies (KEYS) over the past year, gaining 238.5% versus a gain of 124.3%. Over five years, BE leads with a +1278.6% price change compared with +126.1% for KEYS. Bloom Energy is the larger company by market cap ($85.79 billion vs $64.93 billion), about 1.3 times the size.

On valuation, Keysight Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (27.5x vs 58.9x for Bloom Energy). Keysight Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.8% versus -4.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BE+234.93%KEYS+120.04%
+313%+143%-27%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
BE+1421.10%KEYS+135.79%
+1701%+781%-139%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BE versus KEYS key metrics
MetricBEKEYS
Share price$291.29$381.42
Market cap$85.79B$64.93B
1-day change-1.52%-1.70%
YTD return+235.24%+87.72%
1-year return+238.47%+124.27%
5-year return+1278.56%+126.08%
P/E ratio (TTM)383.2851.61
Forward P/E58.9427.50
EPS (TTM)$0.76$7.39
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.02B$5.38B
Revenue growth (YoY)+37.33%+7.95%
Net income (latest FY)$-87.14M$850.00M
Gross margin29.02%62.08%
Operating margin3.60%16.30%
Net margin-4.31%15.81%
52-week high$351.28$389.93
52-week low$75.70$158.79
Distance from 52-week high-17.08%-2.18%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside-2.58%+9.59%
Average volume15.60M1.23M
Shares outstanding294.53M170.24M
Employees2,21416,600
SectorEnergyIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • BE has outperformed KEYS by 114.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Bloom Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (383.3x vs 51.6x trailing P/E).
  • Keysight Technologies is more profitable, keeping 15.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -4.3 cents for Bloom Energy.
  • Bloom Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+37.33% vs +7.95%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Bloom Energy in Energy and Keysight Technologies in Industrials.

About Bloom Energy

BE stock →

Bloom Energy Corporation designs, manufactures, sells, and installs solid oxide fuel cell systems for on-site power generation in the United States and internationally. It offers Bloom Energy Server, an energy server platform to convert fuel, such as natural gas, biogas, hydrogen, or a blend of these fuels, into electricity through a non-combustion electrochemical process.

Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,214 employees

About Keysight Technologies

KEYS stock →

Keysight Technologies, Inc. provides electronic design and test solutions worldwide.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 16,600 employees

BE vs KEYS FAQ

Which is bigger, Bloom Energy or Keysight Technologies?

Bloom Energy (BE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $85.79B compared with $64.93B for Keysight Technologies (KEYS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BE or KEYS?

BE returned +238.47% over the past 12 months, compared with +124.27% for KEYS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BE or KEYS?

KEYS has the lower trailing P/E at 51.6, versus 383.3 for BE. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are Bloom Energy and Keysight Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons