Bel Fuse (BELFA) vs Tecnoglass (TGLS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Bel Fuse (BELFA) has outperformed Tecnoglass (TGLS) over the past year, gaining 65.2% versus a loss of 41.2%. Over five years, BELFA leads with a +1340.1% price change compared with +42.4% for TGLS. Bel Fuse is the larger company by market cap ($2.85 billion vs $1.67 billion), about 1.7 times the size.
On valuation, Tecnoglass trades at a lower forward P/E (11.1x vs 24.7x for Bel Fuse). Tecnoglass offers the higher dividend yield (1.59% vs 0.12%). Tecnoglass converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.2% versus 9.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BELFA | TGLS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $197.49 | $37.68 |
| Market cap | $2.85B | $1.67B |
| 1-day change | +1.21% | -0.44% |
| YTD return | +28.54% | -24.80% |
| 1-year return | +65.15% | -41.21% |
| 5-year return | +1340.07% | +42.36% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 48.29 | 13.17 |
| Forward P/E | 24.66 | 11.07 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.09 | $2.86 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 1.59% |
| Annual dividend | $0.24 | $0.60 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $675.46M | $983.61M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +26.30% | +10.50% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $61.54M | $159.57M |
| Gross margin | 39.15% | 42.84% |
| Operating margin | 16.43% | 23.46% |
| Net margin | 9.11% | 16.22% |
| 52-week high | $293.51 | $65.33 |
| 52-week low | $110.67 | $34.05 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -32.71% | -42.33% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +58.49% | +47.98% |
| Average volume | 129.63K | 286.16K |
| Shares outstanding | 2.12M | 44.36M |
| Employees | 4,964 | 9,601 |
| Sector | Technology | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Electronic Components | Electronic Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BELFA has outperformed TGLS by 106.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Bel Fuse trades at a higher earnings multiple (48.3x vs 13.2x trailing P/E).
- Tecnoglass offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.59% vs 0.12%).
- Tecnoglass is more profitable, keeping 16.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 9.1 cents for Bel Fuse.
- Bel Fuse grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+26.30% vs +10.50%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Bel Fuse in Technology and Tecnoglass in Consumer Discretionary.
About Bel Fuse
BELFA stock →Bel Fuse Inc. designs, manufactures, markets, and sells products that power, protect, and connect electronic circuits.
Technology · Electronic Components · 4,964 employees
About Tecnoglass
TGLS stock →Tecnoglass Holdings Inc. manufactures, supplies, and installs architectural glass, windows, and aluminum and vinyl products for commercial and residential construction markets in Colombia, the United States, Panama, and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Electronic Components · 9,601 employees
BELFA vs TGLS FAQ
Which is bigger, Bel Fuse or Tecnoglass?
Bel Fuse (BELFA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.85B compared with $1.67B for Tecnoglass (TGLS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BELFA or TGLS?
BELFA returned +65.15% over the past 12 months, compared with -41.21% for TGLS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BELFA or TGLS?
TGLS has the lower trailing P/E at 13.2, versus 48.3 for BELFA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Bel Fuse or Tecnoglass?
Tecnoglass has the higher yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.12% for Bel Fuse.
Are Bel Fuse and Tecnoglass in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electronic Components industry within the Technology sector.