MetaCap

Franklin Templeton (BEN) vs PJT Partners (PJT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has outperformed PJT Partners (PJT) over the past year, gaining 38.8% versus a loss of 22.1%. Over five years, PJT leads with a +63.1% price change compared with +8.1% for BEN. Franklin Templeton is the larger company by market cap ($16.44 billion vs $5.77 billion), about 2.9 times the size, while PJT Partners is growing revenue faster (+14.8% vs +3.5%).

On valuation, Franklin Templeton trades at a lower forward P/E (10.2x vs 15.6x for PJT Partners). Franklin Templeton offers the higher dividend yield (4.05% vs 0.74%). PJT Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.5% versus 6.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BEN+38.80%PJT-22.06%
+57%+13%-31%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
BEN+8.09%PJT+66.64%
+136%+43%-50%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BEN versus PJT key metrics
MetricBENPJT
Share price$32.36$135.41
Market cap$16.44B$5.77B
1-day change-0.37%-1.60%
YTD return+35.96%-17.70%
1-year return+38.80%-22.06%
5-year return+8.09%+63.08%
P/E ratio (TTM)22.0118.50
Forward P/E10.1915.56
EPS (TTM)$1.47$7.32
Dividend yield4.05%0.74%
Annual dividend$1.31$1.00
Revenue (latest FY)$8.77B$1.71B
Revenue growth (YoY)+3.45%+14.77%
Net income (latest FY)$524.90M$180.12M
Operating margin6.89%—
Net margin5.98%10.51%
52-week high$36.28$195.62
52-week low$21.11$127.73
Distance from 52-week high-10.80%-30.78%
Analyst consensusholdhold
Avg. price target upside+10.78%+24.07%
Average volume4.06M438.77K
Shares outstanding508.08M25.56M
Employees10,1001,224
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Franklin Templeton is about 2.9 times larger than PJT Partners by market value ($16.44B vs $5.77B).
  • BEN has outperformed PJT by 60.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Franklin Templeton offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.05% vs 0.74%).
  • PJT Partners grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+14.77% vs +3.45%).

About Franklin Templeton

BEN stock →

Franklin Templeton Inc. is a publicly owned asset investment manager.

Finance · Investment Managers · 10,100 employees

About PJT Partners

PJT stock →

PJT Partners Inc., an investment bank, provides various strategic advisory, shareholder advisory, capital markets advisory, and restructuring and special situations services to corporations, financial sponsors, institutional investors, and governments worldwide. It offers advisory services to clients on various transactions, including mergers and acquisitions (M&A), spin-offs, activism defense, contested M&A, joint ventures, minority investments, and divestitures.

Finance · Investment Managers · 1,224 employees

BEN vs PJT FAQ

Which is bigger, Franklin Templeton or PJT Partners?

Franklin Templeton (BEN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $16.44B compared with $5.77B for PJT Partners (PJT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BEN or PJT?

BEN returned +38.80% over the past 12 months, compared with -22.06% for PJT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BEN or PJT?

PJT has the lower trailing P/E at 18.5, versus 22.0 for BEN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Franklin Templeton or PJT Partners?

Franklin Templeton has the higher yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.74% for PJT Partners.

Are Franklin Templeton and PJT Partners in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons