Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable (BEPC) vs Black Hills (BKH)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Black Hills (BKH) has outperformed Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable (BEPC) over the past year, gaining 23.9% versus a loss of 22.5%. Over five years, BKH leads with a +17.5% price change compared with -26.4% for BEPC. Black Hills is the larger company by market cap ($5.78 billion vs $5.48 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
Black Hills offers the higher dividend yield (3.64% vs 2.61%). Black Hills converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.6% versus -62.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BEPC | BKH |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $29.51 | $75.84 |
| Market cap | $5.48B | $5.78B |
| 1-day change | -0.47% | +7.21% |
| YTD return | -23.03% | +9.25% |
| 1-year return | -22.53% | +23.88% |
| 5-year return | -26.37% | +17.45% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 19.10 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.39 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-21.55 | $3.97 |
| Dividend yield | 2.61% | 3.64% |
| Annual dividend | $0.771 | $2.76 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.73B | $2.31B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -10.00% | +8.57% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-2.34B | $291.60M |
| Operating margin | — | 23.27% |
| Net margin | -62.88% | 12.62% |
| 52-week high | $45.18 | $78.69 |
| 52-week low | $27.57 | $59.91 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -34.68% | -3.62% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +31.68% | +8.12% |
| Average volume | 1.81M | 869.75K |
| Shares outstanding | 150.88M | 76.25M |
| Employees | 2,411 | 2,795 |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Electric Utilities: Central | Electric Utilities: Central |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BKH has outperformed BEPC by 46.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Black Hills offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.64% vs 2.61%).
- Black Hills is more profitable, keeping 12.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -62.9 cents for Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable.
- Black Hills grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.57% vs -10.00%).
About Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable
BEPC stock →Brookfield Renewable Corporation owns and operates a portfolio of renewable power and sustainable solution assets. The company's portfolio consists of hydroelectric, wind, utility-scale solar, distributed generation, pumped storage, carbon capture and storage, cogeneration, biomass, and eFuels.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 2,411 employees
About Black Hills
BKH stock →Black Hills Corporation, through its subsidiaries, operates as an electric and natural gas utility company in the United States. The company operates through the Electric Utilities and Gas Utilities segments.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 2,795 employees
BEPC vs BKH FAQ
Which is bigger, Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable or Black Hills?
Black Hills (BKH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.78B compared with $5.48B for Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable (BEPC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BEPC or BKH?
BKH returned +23.88% over the past 12 months, compared with -22.53% for BEPC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable or Black Hills?
Black Hills has the higher yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.61% for Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable.
Are Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable and Black Hills in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.