Benchmark Electronics (BHE) vs Mercury Systems (MRCY)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Benchmark Electronics (BHE) has outperformed Mercury Systems (MRCY) over the past year, gaining 112.9% versus a loss of 6.4%. Over five years, BHE leads with a +211.7% price change compared with +56.8% for MRCY. Mercury Systems is the larger company by market cap ($4.79 billion vs $2.92 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Benchmark Electronics trades at a lower forward P/E (24.6x vs 35.3x for Mercury Systems). Benchmark Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.84%, while Mercury Systems does not currently pay one. Benchmark Electronics converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 0.9% versus -3.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BHE | MRCY |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $81.31 | $78.69 |
| Market cap | $2.92B | $4.79B |
| 1-day change | +0.14% | +0.22% |
| YTD return | +89.80% | +7.55% |
| 1-year return | +112.91% | -6.43% |
| 5-year return | +211.67% | +56.76% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 55.69 | — |
| Forward P/E | 24.59 | 35.29 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.46 | $-0.50 |
| Dividend yield | 0.84% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.68 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.66B | $983.62M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.11% | +7.85% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $24.85M | $-29.67M |
| Gross margin | 10.16% | 28.58% |
| Operating margin | 2.86% | 0.03% |
| Net margin | 0.93% | -3.02% |
| 52-week high | $100.41 | $128.45 |
| 52-week low | $35.91 | $65.04 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.02% | -38.74% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +5.77% | +47.03% |
| Average volume | 384.56K | 695.80K |
| Shares outstanding | 35.92M | 60.86M |
| Employees | 11,840 | 2,102 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BHE has outperformed MRCY by 119.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Mercury Systems grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.85% vs +0.11%).
About Benchmark Electronics
BHE stock →Benchmark Electronics, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, offers product design, engineering services, technology solutions, and manufacturing services in the Americas, Asia, and Europe. It provides design and engineering services and technology solutions, including new product design, prototype, testing, and related engineering services; and custom test and automation equipment design services.
Technology · Electrical Products · 11,840 employees
About Mercury Systems
MRCY stock →Mercury Systems, Inc., engages in the aerospace and defense electronics industry. The company manufactures and sells components, products, modules, and subsystems for defense prime contractors, original equipment manufacturers, government, and commercial aerospace companies.
Technology · Electrical Products · 2,102 employees
BHE vs MRCY FAQ
Which is bigger, Benchmark Electronics or Mercury Systems?
Mercury Systems (MRCY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.79B compared with $2.92B for Benchmark Electronics (BHE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BHE or MRCY?
BHE returned +112.91% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.43% for MRCY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Benchmark Electronics or Mercury Systems?
Benchmark Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.84%, while Mercury Systems does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Benchmark Electronics and Mercury Systems in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.