MetaCap

Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO.B) vs Edwards Lifesciences (EW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO.B) has outperformed Edwards Lifesciences (EW) over the past year, gaining 28.2% versus a gain of 11.8%. Over five years, EW leads with a -23.5% price change compared with -50.5% for BIO.B. Edwards Lifesciences is the larger company by market cap ($49.44 billion vs $9.76 billion), about 5.1 times the size.

On valuation, Bio-Rad Laboratories trades at a lower trailing P/E (46.3x vs 51.1x for Edwards Lifesciences). Bio-Rad Laboratories converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.4% versus 17.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BIO.B+28.15%EW+12.72%
+30%+9%-12%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
BIO.B-50.54%EW-21.11%
+24%-25%-74%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BIO.B versus EW key metrics
MetricBIO.BEW
Share price$365.08$85.78
Market cap$9.76B$49.44B
1-day change0.00%-0.81%
YTD return+17.50%+0.62%
1-year return+28.15%+11.81%
5-year return-50.54%-23.52%
P/E ratio (TTM)46.2751.06
Forward P/E—25.40
EPS (TTM)$7.89$1.68
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.58B$6.07B
Revenue growth (YoY)+0.65%+11.55%
Net income (latest FY)$759.90M$1.07B
Gross margin51.87%78.01%
Operating margin1.83%20.84%
Net margin29.42%17.69%
52-week high$365.08$96.29
52-week low$244.54$72.30
Distance from 52-week high0.00%-10.91%
Analyst consensus—buy
Avg. price target upside—+18.86%
Average volume63.82M
Shares outstanding5.06M576.40M
Employees7,45016,000
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical DevicesMedical Devices

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Edwards Lifesciences is about 5.1 times larger than Bio-Rad Laboratories by market value ($49.44B vs $9.76B).
  • BIO.B has outperformed EW by 16.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories is more profitable, keeping 29.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 17.7 cents for Edwards Lifesciences.
  • Edwards Lifesciences grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.55% vs +0.65%).

About Bio-Rad Laboratories

BIO.B stock →

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. develops, manufactures, and distributes life science research and clinical diagnostic products in the United States, Europe, Asia, Canada, Latin America, and internationally.

Healthcare · Medical Devices · 7,450 employees

About Edwards Lifesciences

EW stock →

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation provides products and technologies to treat advanced cardiovascular diseases in the United States, Europe, Japan, and internationally. It offers transcatheter heart valve replacement products for minimally invasive replacement of aortic heart valves under the Edwards SAPIEN family of valves system; and transcatheter heart valve repair and replacement products to treat mitral and tricuspid valve diseases under the PASCAL and EVOQUE brands.

Healthcare · Medical Devices · 16,000 employees

BIO.B vs EW FAQ

Which is bigger, Bio-Rad Laboratories or Edwards Lifesciences?

Edwards Lifesciences (EW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $49.44B compared with $9.76B for Bio-Rad Laboratories (BIO.B).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BIO.B or EW?

BIO.B returned +28.15% over the past 12 months, compared with +11.81% for EW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BIO.B or EW?

BIO.B has the lower trailing P/E at 46.3, versus 51.1 for EW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are Bio-Rad Laboratories and Edwards Lifesciences in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Medical Devices industry within the Healthcare sector.

More comparisons