Baker Hughes (BKR) vs SLB (SLB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
SLB (SLB) has outperformed Baker Hughes (BKR) over the past year, gaining 39.4% versus a gain of 14.1%. Over five years, BKR leads with a +106.1% price change compared with +41.1% for SLB. SLB is the larger company by market cap ($71.18 billion vs $55.00 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Baker Hughes is growing revenue faster (-0.3% vs -1.6%).
On valuation, SLB trades at a lower forward P/E (14.9x vs 18.8x for Baker Hughes). SLB offers the higher dividend yield (2.42% vs 1.66%). SLB converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.4% versus 9.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BKR | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $55.41 | $47.96 |
| Market cap | $55.00B | $71.18B |
| 1-day change | -3.01% | -4.08% |
| YTD return | +21.67% | +24.96% |
| 1-year return | +14.06% | +39.38% |
| 5-year return | +106.06% | +41.06% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.82 | 24.10 |
| Forward P/E | 18.75 | 14.93 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.11 | $1.99 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 2.42% |
| Annual dividend | $0.92 | $1.16 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $27.73B | $35.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.34% | -1.60% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.59B | $3.37B |
| Net margin | 9.33% | 9.45% |
| 52-week high | $70.41 | $60.46 |
| 52-week low | $43.92 | $31.64 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -21.30% | -20.67% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.44% | +30.28% |
| Average volume | 7.84M | 12.68M |
| Shares outstanding | 992.67M | 1.48B |
| Employees | 54,000 | 109,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Energy |
| Industry | Oil and Gas Field Machinery | Oilfield Services/Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SLB has outperformed BKR by 25.3 percentage points over the past year.
- SLB trades at a higher earnings multiple (24.1x vs 17.8x trailing P/E).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Baker Hughes in Consumer Discretionary and SLB in Energy.
About Baker Hughes
BKR stock →Baker Hughes Company provides a portfolio of technologies and services to energy and industrial value chain. Its Oilfield Services & Equipment segment designs and manufactures exploration, appraisal, development, production, rejuvenation, and decommissioning products and related services for onshore and offshore oilfield operations.
Consumer Discretionary · Oil and Gas Field Machinery · 54,000 employees
About SLB
SLB stock →SLB N.V. engages in the provision of technology for the energy industry worldwide.
Energy · Oilfield Services/Equipment · 109,000 employees
BKR vs SLB FAQ
Which is bigger, Baker Hughes or SLB?
SLB (SLB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $71.18B compared with $55.00B for Baker Hughes (BKR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BKR or SLB?
SLB returned +39.38% over the past 12 months, compared with +14.06% for BKR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BKR or SLB?
BKR has the lower trailing P/E at 17.8, versus 24.1 for SLB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Baker Hughes or SLB?
SLB has the higher yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.66% for Baker Hughes.
Are Baker Hughes and SLB in the same industry?
No. Baker Hughes is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while SLB is in Energy.