Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) vs Dine Brands Global (DIN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) has outperformed Dine Brands Global (DIN) over the past year, gaining 8.6% versus a gain of 7.9%. Over five years, DIN leads with a -63.8% price change compared with -65.2% for BLMN. Bloomin' Brands is the larger company by market cap ($699.5 million vs $366.6 million), about 1.9 times the size.
On valuation, Dine Brands Global trades at a lower forward P/E (6.0x vs 7.5x for Bloomin' Brands). Dine Brands Global offers the higher dividend yield (3.73% vs 1.84%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BLMN | DIN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $8.17 | $28.96 |
| Market cap | $699.52M | $366.61M |
| 1-day change | -1.98% | -1.90% |
| YTD return | +32.41% | -9.89% |
| 1-year return | +8.64% | +7.86% |
| 5-year return | -65.17% | -63.85% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 24.76 | 47.48 |
| Forward P/E | 7.50 | 6.02 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.33 | $0.61 |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 3.73% |
| Annual dividend | $0.15 | $1.08 |
| 52-week high | $12.63 | $39.68 |
| 52-week low | $5.19 | $23.23 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -35.31% | -27.02% |
| Average volume | 2.16M | 363.35K |
| Shares outstanding | 85.62M | 12.66M |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Dine Brands Global trades at a higher earnings multiple (47.5x vs 24.8x trailing P/E).
- Dine Brands Global offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.73% vs 1.84%).
BLMN vs DIN FAQ
Which is bigger, Bloomin' Brands or Dine Brands Global?
Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $699.52M compared with $366.61M for Dine Brands Global (DIN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BLMN or DIN?
BLMN returned +8.64% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.86% for DIN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BLMN or DIN?
BLMN has the lower trailing P/E at 24.8, versus 47.5 for DIN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Bloomin' Brands or Dine Brands Global?
Dine Brands Global has the higher yield at 3.73%, compared with 1.84% for Bloomin' Brands.
Are Bloomin' Brands and Dine Brands Global in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.