Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) vs Glacier Bancorp (GBCI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has outperformed Glacier Bancorp (GBCI) over the past year, gaining 26.0% versus a loss of 10.2%. Over five years, BMA leads with a +275.7% price change compared with -20.8% for GBCI. Glacier Bancorp is the larger company by market cap ($5.56 billion vs $4.15 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Banco Macro S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (5.8x vs 12.0x for Glacier Bancorp). Glacier Bancorp pays a dividend yielding 3.09%, while Banco Macro S.A. does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BMA | GBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $64.96 | $42.73 |
| Market cap | $4.15B | $5.56B |
| 1-day change | -1.43% | -0.58% |
| YTD return | -27.95% | -3.00% |
| 1-year return | +26.04% | -10.16% |
| 5-year return | +275.71% | -20.77% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.28 | 17.58 |
| Forward P/E | 5.77 | 11.97 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.89 | $2.43 |
| Dividend yield | 7.01% | 3.09% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.32 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $101.07M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +7.51% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $239.03M |
| Net margin | — | 236.49% |
| 52-week high | $106.15 | $54.58 |
| 52-week low | $50.24 | $39.90 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -38.80% | -21.71% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +72.77% | +29.49% |
| Average volume | 292.55K | 1.07M |
| Shares outstanding | 62.82M | 130.21M |
| Employees | 8,180 | 4,125 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Commercial Banks | Major Banks |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BMA has outperformed GBCI by 36.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Glacier Bancorp trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.6x vs 13.3x trailing P/E).
- Banco Macro S.A. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.01% vs 3.09%).
About Banco Macro S.A.
BMA stock →Banco Macro S.A. provides various banking products and services to retail and corporate customers in Argentina.
Finance · Commercial Banks · 8,180 employees
About Glacier Bancorp
GBCI stock →Glacier Bancorp, Inc. operates as the bank holding company for Glacier Bank that provides commercial banking services to individuals, small to medium-sized businesses, community organizations, and public entities in the United States.
Finance · Major Banks · 4,125 employees
BMA vs GBCI FAQ
Which is bigger, Banco Macro S.A. or Glacier Bancorp?
Glacier Bancorp (GBCI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.56B compared with $4.15B for Banco Macro S.A. (BMA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BMA or GBCI?
BMA returned +26.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -10.16% for GBCI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BMA or GBCI?
BMA has the lower trailing P/E at 13.3, versus 17.6 for GBCI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Banco Macro S.A. or Glacier Bancorp?
Banco Macro S.A. has the higher yield at 7.01%, compared with 3.09% for Glacier Bancorp.
Are Banco Macro S.A. and Glacier Bancorp in the same industry?
Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Commercial Banks for Banco Macro S.A. and Major Banks for Glacier Bancorp.