Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) vs Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) has outperformed Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) over the past year, gaining 55.9% versus a gain of 55.0%. Over five years, BMA leads with a +281.2% price change compared with +30.4% for PGC. Banco Macro S.A. is the larger company by market cap ($4.21 billion vs $769.6 million), about 5.5 times the size.
On valuation, Banco Macro S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (5.9x vs 9.0x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial). Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays a dividend yielding 0.46%, while Banco Macro S.A. does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BMA | PGC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $65.91 | $43.41 |
| Market cap | $4.21B | $769.57M |
| 1-day change | -3.85% | -1.74% |
| YTD return | -26.90% | +55.87% |
| 1-year return | +54.97% | +55.87% |
| 5-year return | +281.20% | +30.40% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.02 | 15.13 |
| Forward P/E | 5.86 | 9.03 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.70 | $2.87 |
| Dividend yield | 6.64% | 0.46% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.20 |
| 52-week high | $106.15 | $49.14 |
| 52-week low | $45.55 | $24.71 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.91% | -11.66% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +70.22% | — |
| Average volume | 292.26K | 165.87K |
| Shares outstanding | 62.82M | 17.73M |
| Employees | 8,180 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Commercial Banks | Commercial Banks |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Banco Macro S.A. is about 5.5 times larger than Peapack-Gladstone Financial by market value ($4.21B vs $769.57M).
- Banco Macro S.A. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.64% vs 0.46%).
About Banco Macro S.A.
BMA stock →Banco Macro S.A. provides various banking products and services to retail and corporate customers in Argentina.
Finance · Commercial Banks · 8,180 employees
BMA vs PGC FAQ
Which is bigger, Banco Macro S.A. or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.21B compared with $769.57M for Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BMA or PGC?
PGC returned +55.87% over the past 12 months, compared with +54.97% for BMA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BMA or PGC?
BMA has the lower trailing P/E at 14.0, versus 15.1 for PGC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Banco Macro S.A. or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?
Banco Macro S.A. has the higher yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.46% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial.
Are Banco Macro S.A. and Peapack-Gladstone Financial in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Commercial Banks industry within the Finance sector.