MetaCap

Badger Meter (BMI) vs Cognex (CGNX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Cognex (CGNX) has outperformed Badger Meter (BMI) over the past year, gaining 33.2% versus a loss of 30.6%. Over five years, BMI leads with a +19.7% price change compared with -27.5% for CGNX. Cognex is the larger company by market cap ($10.25 billion vs $3.70 billion), about 2.8 times the size, while Badger Meter is growing revenue faster (+10.9% vs +8.7%).

On valuation, Badger Meter trades at a lower forward P/E (25.7x vs 30.0x for Cognex). Badger Meter offers the higher dividend yield (1.25% vs 0.55%). Badger Meter converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.5% versus 11.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BMI-30.63%CGNX+33.21%
+62%+11%-41%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
BMI+17.98%CGNX-23.76%
+146%+33%-81%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BMI versus CGNX key metrics
MetricBMICGNX
Share price$127.66$60.91
Market cap$3.70B$10.25B
1-day change+2.89%-0.49%
YTD return-28.86%+70.12%
1-year return-30.63%+33.21%
5-year return+19.70%-27.48%
P/E ratio (TTM)29.8358.57
Forward P/E25.7030.04
EPS (TTM)$4.28$1.04
Dividend yield1.25%0.55%
Annual dividend$1.60$0.335
Revenue (latest FY)$916.66M$994.36M
Revenue growth (YoY)+10.90%+8.73%
Net income (latest FY)$141.63M$114.44M
Gross margin41.68%66.92%
Operating margin20.01%16.35%
Net margin15.45%11.51%
52-week high$204.00$72.88
52-week low$112.09$34.60
Distance from 52-week high-37.42%-16.42%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+22.72%+29.88%
Average volume414.07K1.89M
Shares outstanding28.99M168.22M
Employees2,4772,745
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Cognex is about 2.8 times larger than Badger Meter by market value ($10.25B vs $3.70B).
  • CGNX has outperformed BMI by 63.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Cognex trades at a higher earnings multiple (58.6x vs 29.8x trailing P/E).

About Badger Meter

BMI stock →

Badger Meter, Inc. manufactures and markets flow measurement, quality, control, and communication solutions worldwide.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,477 employees

About Cognex

CGNX stock →

Cognex Corporation provides machine vision products that capture and analyze visual information to automate manufacturing and distribution tasks in the United States, Europe, Greater China, and internationally. Its machine vision products are used to automate the manufacture and distribution of discrete items, such as mobile phones, automotive components, and e-commerce packages, by locating, identifying, inspecting, and measuring them.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 2,745 employees

BMI vs CGNX FAQ

Which is bigger, Badger Meter or Cognex?

Cognex (CGNX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.25B compared with $3.70B for Badger Meter (BMI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BMI or CGNX?

CGNX returned +33.21% over the past 12 months, compared with -30.63% for BMI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BMI or CGNX?

BMI has the lower trailing P/E at 29.8, versus 58.6 for CGNX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Badger Meter or Cognex?

Badger Meter has the higher yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.55% for Cognex.

Are Badger Meter and Cognex in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons