MetaCap

Brookfield Wealth Solutions (BNT) vs RenaissanceRe (RNR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

RenaissanceRe (RNR) has outperformed Brookfield Wealth Solutions (BNT) over the past year, gaining 21.0% versus a loss of 18.1%. Over five years, RNR leads with a +118.4% price change compared with -8.1% for BNT. RenaissanceRe is the larger company by market cap ($13.42 billion vs $10.13 billion), about 1.3 times the size.

On valuation, RenaissanceRe trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.6x vs 43.9x for Brookfield Wealth Solutions). Brookfield Wealth Solutions offers the higher dividend yield (0.70% vs 0.50%). RenaissanceRe converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.9% versus 7.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BNT-18.14%RNR+20.97%
+29%+3%-22%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
BNT-4.43%RNR+119.29%
+133%+37%-58%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BNT versus RNR key metrics
MetricBNTRNR
Share price$36.91$323.03
Market cap$10.13B$13.42B
1-day change-0.89%-0.43%
YTD return-19.67%+14.89%
1-year return-18.14%+20.97%
5-year return-8.09%+118.38%
P/E ratio (TTM)43.945.58
Forward P/E—7.86
EPS (TTM)$0.84$57.91
Dividend yield0.70%0.50%
Annual dividend$0.26$1.62
Revenue (latest FY)$11.63B$12.85B
Revenue growth (YoY)-17.50%+9.86%
Net income (latest FY)$863.00M$2.68B
Net margin7.42%20.88%
52-week high$49.86$340.24
52-week low$35.73$231.17
Distance from 52-week high-25.97%-5.06%
Analyst consensus—hold
Avg. price target upside—+7.54%
Average volume17.81K308.76K
Shares outstanding59.93M41.55M
Employees4,0001,040
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryProperty-Casualty InsurersProperty-Casualty Insurers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • RNR has outperformed BNT by 39.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Brookfield Wealth Solutions trades at a higher earnings multiple (43.9x vs 5.6x trailing P/E).
  • RenaissanceRe is more profitable, keeping 20.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 7.4 cents for Brookfield Wealth Solutions.
  • RenaissanceRe grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.86% vs -17.50%).

About Brookfield Wealth Solutions

BNT stock →

Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd., through its subsidiaries, provides retirement services, wealth protection products, and capital solutions to individuals and institutions. It operates through Annuities, Property and Casualty (P&C), Life Insurance segments.

Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 4,000 employees

About RenaissanceRe

RNR stock →

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides reinsurance and insurance products in the United States and internationally. The company operates through Property, and Casualty and Specialty segments.

Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 1,040 employees

BNT vs RNR FAQ

Which is bigger, Brookfield Wealth Solutions or RenaissanceRe?

RenaissanceRe (RNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $13.42B compared with $10.13B for Brookfield Wealth Solutions (BNT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BNT or RNR?

RNR returned +20.97% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.14% for BNT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BNT or RNR?

RNR has the lower trailing P/E at 5.6, versus 43.9 for BNT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Brookfield Wealth Solutions or RenaissanceRe?

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has the higher yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.50% for RenaissanceRe.

Are Brookfield Wealth Solutions and RenaissanceRe in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons