Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) vs Greenfire Resources (GFR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Greenfire Resources (GFR) has outperformed Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) over the past year, gaining 32.6% versus a gain of 10.3%. Black Stone Minerals L.P. is the larger company by market cap ($3.14 billion vs $1.50 billion), about 2.1 times the size. On valuation, Greenfire Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (8.3x vs 13.1x for Black Stone Minerals L.P.).
Black Stone Minerals L.P. pays a dividend yielding 8.27%, while Greenfire Resources does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BSM | GFR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.75 | $6.26 |
| Market cap | $3.14B | $1.50B |
| 1-day change | +0.89% | +1.95% |
| YTD return | +10.99% | +31.51% |
| 1-year return | +10.32% | +32.63% |
| 5-year return | +20.41% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.29 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.11 | 8.26 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.20 | $-0.20 |
| Dividend yield | 8.27% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.22 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $469.92M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.35% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $299.93M | — |
| Operating margin | 65.63% | — |
| Net margin | 63.83% | — |
| 52-week high | $15.49 | $7.16 |
| 52-week low | $12.32 | $4.15 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -4.78% | -12.57% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.47% | — |
| Average volume | 372.44K | 819.66K |
| Shares outstanding | 212.71M | 240.41M |
| Employees | — | 197 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Black Stone Minerals L.P. is about 2.1 times larger than Greenfire Resources by market value ($3.14B vs $1.50B).
- GFR has outperformed BSM by 22.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Black Stone Minerals L.P. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.27% vs 0.00%).
About Black Stone Minerals L.P.
BSM stock →Black Stone Minerals, L.P., together with its subsidiaries, owns and manages oil and natural gas mineral interests. It owns mineral interests in approximately 16.9 million gross acres, nonparticipating royalty interests in 1.8 million gross acres, and overriding royalty interests in 1.6 million gross acres located in 41 states in the United States.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production
About Greenfire Resources
GFR stock →Greenfire Resources Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the exploration, development, and operation of oil and gas properties in the Athabasca oil sands region of Alberta, Canada. The company's principal asset includes the Hangingstone Facilities which consist of the Expansion Asset and the Demo Asset located in south of Fort McMurray, Alberta.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 197 employees
BSM vs GFR FAQ
Which is bigger, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Greenfire Resources?
Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.14B compared with $1.50B for Greenfire Resources (GFR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BSM or GFR?
GFR returned +32.63% over the past 12 months, compared with +10.32% for BSM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Greenfire Resources?
Black Stone Minerals L.P. pays a dividend yielding 8.27%, while Greenfire Resources does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Black Stone Minerals L.P. and Greenfire Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.