MetaCap

Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) vs Mach Natural Resources (MNR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) has outperformed Mach Natural Resources (MNR) over the past year, gaining 8.7% versus a loss of 18.8%. Black Stone Minerals L.P. is the larger company by market cap ($3.15 billion vs $1.79 billion), about 1.8 times the size. On valuation, Mach Natural Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (8.2x vs 13.1x for Black Stone Minerals L.P.).

Mach Natural Resources offers the higher dividend yield (16.77% vs 8.25%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BSM+8.66%MNR-18.81%
+16%-4%-24%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
BSM-17.53%MNR-43.30%
+13%-17%-48%
Oct 23, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BSM versus MNR key metrics
MetricBSMMNR
Share price$14.79$10.74
Market cap$3.15B$1.79B
1-day change+1.16%+0.70%
YTD return+10.46%-3.44%
1-year return+8.66%-18.81%
5-year return+19.84%—
P/E ratio (TTM)12.3317.89
Forward P/E13.158.22
EPS (TTM)$1.20$0.60
Dividend yield8.25%16.77%
Annual dividend$1.22$1.80
Revenue (latest FY)$469.92M—
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.35%—
Net income (latest FY)$299.93M—
Operating margin65.63%—
Net margin63.83%—
52-week high$15.49$15.02
52-week low$12.32$10.15
Distance from 52-week high-4.52%-28.53%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+8.18%+54.91%
Average volume372.02K637.11K
Shares outstanding212.71M166.95M
Employees—840
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas ProductionOil & Gas Production

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • BSM has outperformed MNR by 27.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Mach Natural Resources trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.9x vs 12.3x trailing P/E).
  • Mach Natural Resources offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (16.77% vs 8.25%).

About Black Stone Minerals L.P.

BSM stock →

Black Stone Minerals, L.P., together with its subsidiaries, owns and manages oil and natural gas mineral interests. It owns mineral interests in approximately 16.9 million gross acres, nonparticipating royalty interests in 1.8 million gross acres, and overriding royalty interests in 1.6 million gross acres located in 41 states in the United States.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production

About Mach Natural Resources

MNR stock →

Mach Natural Resources LP, an independent upstream oil and gas company, focuses on the acquisition, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGL) reserves. The company owns a portfolio of midstream assets, as well as owns gathering systems, processing plants.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 840 employees

BSM vs MNR FAQ

Which is bigger, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Mach Natural Resources?

Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.15B compared with $1.79B for Mach Natural Resources (MNR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BSM or MNR?

BSM returned +8.66% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.81% for MNR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BSM or MNR?

BSM has the lower trailing P/E at 12.3, versus 17.9 for MNR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Mach Natural Resources?

Mach Natural Resources has the higher yield at 16.77%, compared with 8.25% for Black Stone Minerals L.P..

Are Black Stone Minerals L.P. and Mach Natural Resources in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons