Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) vs Woodside Energy Group (WDS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Woodside Energy Group (WDS) has outperformed Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) over the past year, gaining 43.0% versus a gain of 8.7%. Over five years, BSM leads with a +19.8% price change compared with +16.6% for WDS. On valuation, Woodside Energy Group trades at a lower forward P/E (11.5x vs 13.0x for Black Stone Minerals L.P.).
Black Stone Minerals L.P. offers the higher dividend yield (8.34% vs 5.33%). Black Stone Minerals L.P. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 63.8% versus 20.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BSM | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.62 | $21.77 |
| Market cap | $3.11B | — |
| 1-day change | -0.41% | +0.09% |
| YTD return | +10.46% | +39.51% |
| 1-year return | +8.66% | +43.00% |
| 5-year return | +19.84% | +16.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.18 | 13.61 |
| Forward P/E | 13.00 | 11.47 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.20 | $1.60 |
| Dividend yield | 8.34% | 5.33% |
| Annual dividend | $1.22 | $1.16 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $469.92M | $12.98B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.35% | -1.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $299.93M | $2.72B |
| Gross margin | — | 34.94% |
| Operating margin | 65.63% | 29.95% |
| Net margin | 63.83% | 20.93% |
| 52-week high | $15.49 | $25.19 |
| 52-week low | $12.32 | $14.27 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.62% | -13.58% |
| Analyst consensus | none | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +9.44% | +12.68% |
| Average volume | 375.85K | 624.89K |
| Shares outstanding | 212.71M | — |
| Employees | — | 4,693 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WDS has outperformed BSM by 34.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Black Stone Minerals L.P. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.34% vs 5.33%).
- Black Stone Minerals L.P. is more profitable, keeping 63.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 20.9 cents for Woodside Energy Group.
- Black Stone Minerals L.P. grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.35% vs -1.48%).
About Black Stone Minerals L.P.
BSM stock →Black Stone Minerals, L.P., together with its subsidiaries, owns and manages oil and natural gas mineral interests. It owns mineral interests in approximately 16.9 million gross acres, nonparticipating royalty interests in 1.8 million gross acres, and overriding royalty interests in 1.6 million gross acres located in 41 states in the United States.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production
About Woodside Energy Group
WDS stock →Woodside Energy Group Ltd engages in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing, and sale of hydrocarbons in the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and the Europe. It produces liquefied natural gas, pipeline gas, crude oil and condensate, and natural gas liquids.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 4,693 employees
BSM vs WDS FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BSM or WDS?
WDS returned +43.00% over the past 12 months, compared with +8.66% for BSM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BSM or WDS?
BSM has the lower trailing P/E at 12.2, versus 13.6 for WDS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Woodside Energy Group?
Black Stone Minerals L.P. has the higher yield at 8.34%, compared with 5.33% for Woodside Energy Group.
Are Black Stone Minerals L.P. and Woodside Energy Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.