MetaCap

Burlington Stores (BURL) vs lululemon athletica inc. (LULU)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

Burlington Stores (BURL) has outperformed lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) over the past year, gaining 6.3% versus a loss of 45.5%. Over five years, BURL leads with a +3.0% price change compared with -76.6% for LULU. Burlington Stores is the larger company by market cap ($17.40 billion vs $10.95 billion), about 1.6 times the size.

On valuation, lululemon athletica inc. trades at a lower forward P/E (10.9x vs 20.2x for Burlington Stores). lululemon athletica inc. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.2% versus 5.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BURL+6.33%LULU-45.53%
+47%-2%-52%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
BURL-0.17%LULU-76.21%
+38%-22%-82%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BURL versus LULU key metrics
MetricBURLLULU
Share price$276.97$94.50
Market cap$17.40B$10.95B
1-day change+0.05%+1.96%
YTD return-4.11%-54.53%
1-year return+6.33%-45.53%
5-year return+2.99%-76.58%
P/E ratio (TTM)24.887.78
Forward P/E20.2510.93
EPS (TTM)$11.13$12.15
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$11.57B$11.10B
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.76%+4.86%
Net income (latest FY)$610.15M$1.58B
Gross margin43.92%56.60%
Operating margin—19.91%
Net margin5.27%14.22%
52-week high$378.33$225.98
52-week low$226.85$90.38
Distance from 52-week high-26.79%-58.18%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+31.69%+11.02%
Average volume1.26M4.74M
Shares outstanding62.82M105.59M
Employees17,49539,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryDepartment/Specialty Retail StoresApparel

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • BURL has outperformed LULU by 51.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Burlington Stores trades at a higher earnings multiple (24.9x vs 7.8x trailing P/E).
  • lululemon athletica inc. is more profitable, keeping 14.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.3 cents for Burlington Stores.

About Burlington Stores

BURL stock →

Burlington Stores, Inc. operates as a retailer of branded merchandise in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Consumer Discretionary · Department/Specialty Retail Stores · 17,495 employees

About lululemon athletica inc.

LULU stock →

lululemon athletica inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, distributes, and retails technical athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories for women and men under the lululemon brand in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Greece, and internationally. It offers pants, shorts, tops, and jackets for athletic activities, such as yoga, running, training, and other activities.

Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 39,000 employees

BURL vs LULU FAQ

Which is bigger, Burlington Stores or lululemon athletica inc.?

Burlington Stores (BURL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $17.40B compared with $10.95B for lululemon athletica inc. (LULU).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BURL or LULU?

BURL returned +6.33% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.53% for LULU (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BURL or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E at 7.8, versus 24.9 for BURL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are Burlington Stores and lululemon athletica inc. in the same industry?

Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Department/Specialty Retail Stores for Burlington Stores and Apparel for lululemon athletica inc..

More comparisons