MetaCap

BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) vs Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund (EVV)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (7.9x vs 13.5x for Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund). Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund pays a dividend yielding 10.49%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

BWG versus EVV key metrics
MetricBWGEVV
Share price$6.96$8.36
1-day change-0.29%-0.83%
P/E ratio (TTM)7.9113.48
EPS (TTM)$0.88$0.62
Dividend yield13.75%10.49%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.877
52-week high$8.77$10.23
52-week low$6.77$8.31
Distance from 52-week high-20.64%-18.28%
Average volume75.18K552.43K
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance/Investors ServicesFinance/Investors Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (13.5x vs 7.9x trailing P/E).
  • BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (13.75% vs 10.49%).

BWG vs EVV FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BWG or EVV?

BWG has the lower trailing P/E at 7.9, versus 13.5 for EVV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund or Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund?

BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund has the higher yield at 13.75%, compared with 10.49% for Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund.

Are BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund and Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons