Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) vs ICF International (ICFI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) has outperformed ICF International (ICFI) over the past year, losing 0.7% versus a loss of 6.2%. Over five years, BWMN leads with a +203.6% price change compared with -11.4% for ICFI. ICF International is the larger company by market cap ($1.56 billion vs $709.8 million), about 2.2 times the size.
On valuation, ICF International trades at a lower forward P/E (11.3x vs 17.3x for Bowman Consulting Group). ICF International pays a dividend yielding 0.65%, while Bowman Consulting Group does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BWMN | ICFI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $42.78 | $86.82 |
| Market cap | $709.80M | $1.56B |
| 1-day change | -0.02% | +4.79% |
| YTD return | +29.56% | +1.78% |
| 1-year return | -0.65% | -6.24% |
| 5-year return | +203.62% | -11.44% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 104.34 | 17.98 |
| Forward P/E | 17.26 | 11.26 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.41 | $4.83 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.56 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $1.87B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -7.27% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $91.59M |
| Gross margin | — | 37.16% |
| Operating margin | — | 7.77% |
| Net margin | — | 4.89% |
| 52-week high | $45.83 | $98.03 |
| 52-week low | $25.07 | $58.83 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.66% | -11.44% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +0.51% | +23.53% |
| Average volume | 361.26K | 205.26K |
| Shares outstanding | 16.59M | 17.93M |
| Employees | 2,500 | 6,972 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Professional Services | Professional Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ICF International is about 2.2 times larger than Bowman Consulting Group by market value ($1.56B vs $709.80M).
- Bowman Consulting Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (104.3x vs 18.0x trailing P/E).
About Bowman Consulting Group
BWMN stock →Bowman Consulting Group Ltd., provides engineering, technical consulting, and program management services in the United States. The company offers planning, engineering, program management, commissioning, environmental consulting, geospatial imaging, surveying, land procurement, and other infrastructure management services.
Consumer Discretionary · Professional Services · 2,500 employees
About ICF International
ICFI stock →ICF International, Inc. provides management, technology, and policy consulting and implementation services to government and commercial clients in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Professional Services · 6,972 employees
BWMN vs ICFI FAQ
Which is bigger, Bowman Consulting Group or ICF International?
ICF International (ICFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.56B compared with $709.80M for Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BWMN or ICFI?
BWMN returned -0.65% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.24% for ICFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BWMN or ICFI?
ICFI has the lower trailing P/E at 18.0, versus 104.3 for BWMN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Bowman Consulting Group or ICF International?
ICF International pays a dividend yielding 0.65%, while Bowman Consulting Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Bowman Consulting Group and ICF International in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Professional Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.