BWX Technologies (BWXT) vs Onto Innovation (ONTO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Onto Innovation (ONTO) has outperformed BWX Technologies (BWXT) over the past year, gaining 125.3% versus a loss of 26.0%. Over five years, ONTO leads with a +321.6% price change compared with +150.8% for BWXT. Onto Innovation is the larger company by market cap ($14.94 billion vs $12.97 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while BWX Technologies is growing revenue faster (+18.3% vs +1.8%).
On valuation, Onto Innovation trades at a lower forward P/E (26.0x vs 27.1x for BWX Technologies). BWX Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.73%, while Onto Innovation does not currently pay one. Onto Innovation converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.6% versus 10.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BWXT | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $141.54 | $304.40 |
| Market cap | $12.97B | $14.94B |
| 1-day change | -2.86% | -2.97% |
| YTD return | -18.11% | +92.83% |
| 1-year return | -26.05% | +125.30% |
| 5-year return | +150.82% | +321.61% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 37.74 | 114.44 |
| Forward P/E | 27.06 | 26.02 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.75 | $2.66 |
| Dividend yield | 0.73% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.04 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.20B | $1.01B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.30% | +1.82% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $328.94M | $136.76M |
| Gross margin | 22.91% | 49.72% |
| Operating margin | 12.65% | 13.22% |
| Net margin | 10.28% | 13.60% |
| 52-week high | $241.82 | $386.46 |
| 52-week low | $131.86 | $118.97 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -41.47% | -21.23% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +52.26% | +27.30% |
| Average volume | 1.08M | 1.01M |
| Shares outstanding | 91.62M | 49.07M |
| Employees | 11,000 | 1,867 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ONTO has outperformed BWXT by 151.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Onto Innovation trades at a higher earnings multiple (114.4x vs 37.7x trailing P/E).
- BWX Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.30% vs +1.82%).
About BWX Technologies
BWXT stock →BWX Technologies, Inc. manufactures and sells nuclear components in the United States, Canada, and internationally.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 11,000 employees
About Onto Innovation
ONTO stock →Onto Innovation Inc. engages in the design, development, manufacture, and support of process control tools that perform macro-defect inspection and metrology in the United States, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, China, Southeast Asia, Asia, and Europe.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 1,867 employees
BWXT vs ONTO FAQ
Which is bigger, BWX Technologies or Onto Innovation?
Onto Innovation (ONTO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.94B compared with $12.97B for BWX Technologies (BWXT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BWXT or ONTO?
ONTO returned +125.30% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.05% for BWXT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BWXT or ONTO?
BWXT has the lower trailing P/E at 37.7, versus 114.4 for ONTO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BWX Technologies or Onto Innovation?
BWX Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.73%, while Onto Innovation does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are BWX Technologies and Onto Innovation in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.