KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares (BZ) vs Snap (SNAP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Snap (SNAP) has outperformed KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares (BZ) over the past year, losing 27.6% versus a loss of 37.0%. Over five years, BZ leads with a -56.2% price change compared with -92.4% for SNAP. Snap is the larger company by market cap ($9.83 billion vs $6.58 billion), about 1.5 times the size, while KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares is growing revenue faster (+17.3% vs +10.6%).
On valuation, Snap trades at a lower forward P/E (7.5x vs 10.1x for KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares). KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 33.1% versus -7.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BZ | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.05 | $5.81 |
| Market cap | $6.58B | $9.83B |
| 1-day change | -0.40% | +0.52% |
| YTD return | -25.69% | -27.08% |
| 1-year return | -37.03% | -27.61% |
| 5-year return | -56.16% | -92.39% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.83 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.12 | 7.49 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.39 | $-0.18 |
| Dividend yield | 3.38% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.18B | $5.93B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +17.32% | +10.63% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $391.15M | $-460.49M |
| Gross margin | 85.06% | 54.99% |
| Operating margin | 29.80% | -8.97% |
| Net margin | 33.09% | -7.76% |
| 52-week high | $24.45 | $9.13 |
| 52-week low | $12.57 | $3.81 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -38.45% | -36.36% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +44.52% | +27.37% |
| Average volume | 6.13M | 36.14M |
| Shares outstanding | 382.01M | 1.44B |
| Employees | 5,219 | 5,261 |
| Sector | Communication Services | Communication Services |
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.38% vs 0.00%).
- KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares is more profitable, keeping 33.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -7.8 cents for Snap.
- KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+17.32% vs +10.63%).
About KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares
BZ stock →Kanzhun Limited, together with its subsidiaries, operates an online recruitment platform in the People's Republic of China. It offers job seeking services that allow job seekers to receive job recommendations, initiate direct chats, and deliver resumes upon mutual consent, as well as value-added tools.
Communication Services · Internet Content & Information · 5,219 employees
About Snap
SNAP stock →Snap Inc. operates as a technology company in North America, Europe, and internationally.
Communication Services · Internet Content & Information · 5,261 employees
BZ vs SNAP FAQ
Which is bigger, KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares or Snap?
Snap (SNAP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.83B compared with $6.58B for KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares (BZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BZ or SNAP?
SNAP returned -27.61% over the past 12 months, compared with -37.03% for BZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares or Snap?
KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares pays a dividend yielding 3.38%, while Snap does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are KANZHUN LIMITED American Depository Shares and Snap in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Internet Content & Information industry within the Communication Services sector.