ConAgra Brands (CAG) vs McCormick (MKC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
ConAgra Brands (CAG) has outperformed McCormick (MKC) over the past year, losing 29.9% versus a loss of 31.0%. Over five years, MKC leads with a -43.2% price change compared with -60.2% for CAG. McCormick is the larger company by market cap ($12.18 billion vs $6.33 billion), about 1.9 times the size.
On valuation, ConAgra Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (8.7x vs 14.1x for McCormick). ConAgra Brands offers the higher dividend yield (9.25% vs 4.18%). McCormick converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.5% versus -17.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CAG | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.25 | $45.25 |
| Market cap | $6.33B | $12.18B |
| 1-day change | -1.49% | -0.33% |
| YTD return | -23.45% | -33.56% |
| 1-year return | -29.93% | -31.04% |
| 5-year return | -60.15% | -43.17% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 8.18 |
| Forward P/E | 8.69 | 14.08 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.06 | $5.53 |
| Dividend yield | 9.25% | 4.18% |
| Annual dividend | $1.23 | $1.89 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $11.28B | $6.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.85% | +1.73% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.92B | $789.40M |
| Gross margin | 23.92% | 37.90% |
| Operating margin | -14.43% | 15.65% |
| Net margin | -16.99% | 11.54% |
| 52-week high | $20.32 | $72.41 |
| 52-week low | $12.53 | $43.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -34.79% | -37.51% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.08% | +21.22% |
| Average volume | 13.11M | 3.23M |
| Shares outstanding | 477.41M | 254.54M |
| Employees | 17,400 | 14,100 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ConAgra Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.25% vs 4.18%).
- McCormick is more profitable, keeping 11.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -17.0 cents for ConAgra Brands.
About ConAgra Brands
CAG stock →Conagra Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a branded consumer packaged goods food company primarily in the United States. The company operates in four segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, and Foodservice.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 17,400 employees
About McCormick
MKC stock →McCormick & Company, Incorporated manufactures, markets, and distributes herbs, spices, seasoning mixes, condiments, and other flavorful products to the food industry. It operates in two segments, Consumer and Flavor Solutions.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 14,100 employees
CAG vs MKC FAQ
Which is bigger, ConAgra Brands or McCormick?
McCormick (MKC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.18B compared with $6.33B for ConAgra Brands (CAG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CAG or MKC?
CAG returned -29.93% over the past 12 months, compared with -31.04% for MKC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, ConAgra Brands or McCormick?
ConAgra Brands has the higher yield at 9.25%, compared with 4.18% for McCormick.
Are ConAgra Brands and McCormick in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Staples sector.