McCormick (MKC) vs J.M. Smucker (SJM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
J.M. Smucker (SJM) has outperformed McCormick (MKC) over the past year, gaining 7.9% versus a loss of 30.8%. Over five years, SJM leads with a -4.4% price change compared with -43.0% for MKC. J.M. Smucker is the larger company by market cap ($12.38 billion vs $12.18 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, J.M. Smucker trades at a lower forward P/E (10.6x vs 14.1x for McCormick). McCormick offers the higher dividend yield (4.18% vs 3.81%). McCormick converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.5% versus -1.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MKC | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $45.25 | $115.93 |
| Market cap | $12.18B | $12.38B |
| 1-day change | -0.33% | -0.74% |
| YTD return | -33.34% | +19.29% |
| 1-year return | -30.81% | +7.90% |
| 5-year return | -42.99% | -4.42% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.18 | 53.92 |
| Forward P/E | 14.08 | 10.61 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.53 | $2.15 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 3.81% |
| Annual dividend | $1.89 | $4.42 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.84B | $9.05B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.73% | +3.72% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $789.40M | $-138.70M |
| Gross margin | 37.90% | 33.53% |
| Operating margin | 15.65% | 3.98% |
| Net margin | 11.54% | -1.53% |
| 52-week high | $72.41 | $135.89 |
| 52-week low | $43.25 | $88.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.51% | -14.69% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +21.22% | +22.60% |
| Average volume | 3.23M | 1.34M |
| Shares outstanding | 254.54M | 106.82M |
| Employees | 14,100 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SJM has outperformed MKC by 38.7 percentage points over the past year.
- J.M. Smucker trades at a higher earnings multiple (53.9x vs 8.2x trailing P/E).
- McCormick is more profitable, keeping 11.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.5 cents for J.M. Smucker.
About McCormick
MKC stock →McCormick & Company, Incorporated manufactures, markets, and distributes herbs, spices, seasoning mixes, condiments, and other flavorful products to the food industry. It operates in two segments, Consumer and Flavor Solutions.
Consumer Defensive · Packaged Foods · 14,100 employees
About J.M. Smucker
SJM stock →The J. M.
Consumer Defensive · Packaged Foods
MKC vs SJM FAQ
Which is bigger, McCormick or J.M. Smucker?
J.M. Smucker (SJM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.38B compared with $12.18B for McCormick (MKC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MKC or SJM?
SJM returned +7.90% over the past 12 months, compared with -30.81% for MKC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MKC or SJM?
MKC has the lower trailing P/E at 8.2, versus 53.9 for SJM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, McCormick or J.M. Smucker?
McCormick has the higher yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.81% for J.M. Smucker.
Are McCormick and J.M. Smucker in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.