ConAgra Brands (CAG) vs Smithfield Foods (SFD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Smithfield Foods (SFD) has outperformed ConAgra Brands (CAG) over the past year, losing 17.1% versus a loss of 29.9%. Smithfield Foods is the larger company by market cap ($7.28 billion vs $6.33 billion), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, Smithfield Foods trades at a lower forward P/E (8.4x vs 8.7x for ConAgra Brands).
ConAgra Brands offers the higher dividend yield (9.25% vs 6.08%). Smithfield Foods converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.4% versus -17.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CAG | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.25 | $18.50 |
| Market cap | $6.33B | $7.28B |
| 1-day change | -1.49% | -1.49% |
| YTD return | -23.45% | -17.15% |
| 1-year return | -29.93% | -17.11% |
| 5-year return | -60.15% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 6.88 |
| Forward P/E | 8.69 | 8.43 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.06 | $2.69 |
| Dividend yield | 9.25% | 6.08% |
| Annual dividend | $1.23 | $1.13 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $11.28B | $15.53B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.85% | +9.82% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.92B | $987.00M |
| Gross margin | 23.92% | 13.45% |
| Operating margin | -14.43% | 8.32% |
| Net margin | -16.99% | 6.36% |
| 52-week high | $20.32 | $29.81 |
| 52-week low | $12.53 | $18.43 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -34.79% | -37.93% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.08% | +40.92% |
| Average volume | 13.11M | 1.69M |
| Shares outstanding | 477.41M | 393.77M |
| Employees | 17,400 | 34,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Meat/Poultry/Fish |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SFD has outperformed CAG by 12.8 percentage points over the past year.
- ConAgra Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.25% vs 6.08%).
- Smithfield Foods is more profitable, keeping 6.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -17.0 cents for ConAgra Brands.
- Smithfield Foods grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.82% vs -2.85%).
About ConAgra Brands
CAG stock →Conagra Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a branded consumer packaged goods food company primarily in the United States. The company operates in four segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, and Foodservice.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 17,400 employees
About Smithfield Foods
SFD stock →Smithfield Foods, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces various packaged meats and fresh pork products in the United States and internationally. It operates through Packaged Meats, Fresh Pork, Hog Production, and Other segments.
Consumer Staples · Meat/Poultry/Fish · 34,000 employees
CAG vs SFD FAQ
Which is bigger, ConAgra Brands or Smithfield Foods?
Smithfield Foods (SFD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.28B compared with $6.33B for ConAgra Brands (CAG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CAG or SFD?
SFD returned -17.11% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.93% for CAG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, ConAgra Brands or Smithfield Foods?
ConAgra Brands has the higher yield at 9.25%, compared with 6.08% for Smithfield Foods.
Are ConAgra Brands and Smithfield Foods in the same industry?
Both are in the Consumer Staples sector, but in different industries: Packaged Foods for ConAgra Brands and Meat/Poultry/Fish for Smithfield Foods.