MetaCap

Cato (CATO) vs Digital Brands Group (DBGI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Cato is the larger company by market cap ($47.4 million vs $4.2 million), about 11.3 times the size.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CATO versus DBGI key metrics
MetricCATODBGI
Share price$2.38$4.50
Market cap$47.39M$4.20M
1-day change+0.42%+3.93%
YTD return-23.30%—
1-year return-45.01%—
5-year return-86.10%—
Forward P/E1.83—
EPS (TTM)$-0.31$-88.99
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
52-week high$4.59$720.00
52-week low$2.30$3.14
Distance from 52-week high-48.15%-99.38%
Average volume127.32K772.57K
Shares outstanding18.15M933.51K
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryClothing/Shoe/Accessory StoresClothing/Shoe/Accessory Stores

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Cato is about 11.3 times larger than Digital Brands Group by market value ($47.39M vs $4.20M).

CATO vs DBGI FAQ

Which is bigger, Cato or Digital Brands Group?

Cato (CATO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $47.39M compared with $4.20M for Digital Brands Group (DBGI).

Are Cato and Digital Brands Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Clothing/Shoe/Accessory Stores industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons