MetaCap

Crown (CCK) vs Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Crown (CCK) has outperformed Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS) over the past year, gaining 16.2% versus a loss of 8.9%. Over five years, WMS leads with a +11.6% price change compared with +3.2% for CCK. Crown is the larger company by market cap ($11.65 billion vs $9.51 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Advanced Drainage Systems is growing revenue faster (+5.0% vs +4.8%).

On valuation, Crown trades at a lower forward P/E (11.8x vs 17.1x for Advanced Drainage Systems). Crown offers the higher dividend yield (1.14% vs 0.59%). Advanced Drainage Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.0% versus 6.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CCK+16.16%WMS-8.88%
+35%+12%-12%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CCK+3.34%WMS+13.26%
+62%+12%-39%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CCK versus WMS key metrics
MetricCCKWMS
Share price$107.10$126.08
Market cap$11.65B$9.51B
1-day change-0.55%-3.07%
YTD return+4.01%-12.95%
1-year return+16.16%-8.88%
5-year return+3.21%+11.63%
P/E ratio (TTM)15.4121.48
Forward P/E11.8317.10
EPS (TTM)$6.95$5.87
Dividend yield1.14%0.59%
Annual dividend$1.22$0.74
Revenue (latest FY)$12.37B$3.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)+4.78%+5.03%
Net income (latest FY)$738.00M$426.46M
Gross margin22.03%38.27%
Operating margin12.56%20.30%
Net margin5.97%13.98%
52-week high$122.91$179.32
52-week low$89.21$124.39
Distance from 52-week high-12.86%-29.69%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+25.99%+45.07%
Average volume971.95K701.53K
Shares outstanding108.76M75.41M
Employees23,0006,425
SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
IndustryContainers/PackagingContainers/Packaging

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CCK has outperformed WMS by 25.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Advanced Drainage Systems trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.5x vs 15.4x trailing P/E).
  • Advanced Drainage Systems is more profitable, keeping 14.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.0 cents for Crown.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Crown in Industrials and Advanced Drainage Systems in Consumer Discretionary.

About Crown

CCK stock →

Crown Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the packaging business in the United States and internationally. It operates through Americas Beverage, European Beverage, Asia Pacific, and Transit Packaging segments.

Industrials · Containers/Packaging · 23,000 employees

About Advanced Drainage Systems

WMS stock →

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets thermoplastic corrugated pipes and related water management products in the United States, Canada, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Containers/Packaging · 6,425 employees

CCK vs WMS FAQ

Which is bigger, Crown or Advanced Drainage Systems?

Crown (CCK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.65B compared with $9.51B for Advanced Drainage Systems (WMS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CCK or WMS?

CCK returned +16.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -8.88% for WMS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CCK or WMS?

CCK has the lower trailing P/E at 15.4, versus 21.5 for WMS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Crown or Advanced Drainage Systems?

Crown has the higher yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.59% for Advanced Drainage Systems.

Are Crown and Advanced Drainage Systems in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Containers/Packaging industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons