Celsius (CELH) vs Monster Beverage (MNST)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Monster Beverage (MNST) has outperformed Celsius (CELH) over the past year, gaining 25.7% versus a loss of 55.9%. Over five years, MNST leads with a +100.2% price change compared with -9.2% for CELH. Monster Beverage is the larger company by market cap ($84.00 billion vs $6.81 billion), about 12.3 times the size, while Celsius is growing revenue faster (+85.5% vs +10.7%).
On valuation, Celsius trades at a lower forward P/E (15.6x vs 32.8x for Monster Beverage). Monster Beverage converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.0% versus 4.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $26.92 | $42.88 |
| Market cap | $6.81B | $84.00B |
| 1-day change | -1.36% | -0.86% |
| YTD return | -41.15% | +11.75% |
| 1-year return | -55.91% | +25.72% |
| 5-year return | -9.17% | +100.23% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 117.04 | 39.70 |
| Forward P/E | 15.58 | 32.78 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.23 | $1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.52B | $8.29B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +85.54% | +10.70% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $108.00M | $1.91B |
| Gross margin | 50.39% | 55.85% |
| Operating margin | 5.61% | 29.17% |
| Net margin | 4.29% | 22.97% |
| 52-week high | $66.74 | $50.17 |
| 52-week low | $23.56 | $32.94 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -59.66% | -14.53% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +56.72% | +16.65% |
| Average volume | 9.20M | 10.49M |
| Shares outstanding | 253.04M | 1.96B |
| Employees | 1,497 | 5,773 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Beverages (Production/Distribution) | Beverages (Production/Distribution) |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Monster Beverage is about 12.3 times larger than Celsius by market value ($84.00B vs $6.81B).
- MNST has outperformed CELH by 81.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Celsius trades at a higher earnings multiple (117.0x vs 39.7x trailing P/E).
- Monster Beverage is more profitable, keeping 23.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.3 cents for Celsius.
- Celsius grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+85.54% vs +10.70%).
About Celsius
CELH stock →Celsius Holdings, Inc. develops, processes, manufactures, markets, sells, and distributes functional energy drinks in the United States, North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, and internationally.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 1,497 employees
About Monster Beverage
MNST stock →Monster Beverage Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in development, marketing, sale, and distribution of energy drink beverages and concentrates in the United States and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Monster Energy Drinks, Strategic Brands, Alcohol Brands, and Other.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 5,773 employees
CELH vs MNST FAQ
Which is bigger, Celsius or Monster Beverage?
Monster Beverage (MNST) is larger, with a market capitalization of $84.00B compared with $6.81B for Celsius (CELH).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CELH or MNST?
MNST returned +25.72% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.91% for CELH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CELH or MNST?
MNST has the lower trailing P/E at 39.7, versus 117.0 for CELH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Celsius and Monster Beverage in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Beverages (Production/Distribution) industry within the Consumer Staples sector.