Central Garden & Pet (CENT) vs Seneca Foods (SENEB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Seneca Foods (SENEB) has outperformed Central Garden & Pet (CENT) over the past year, gaining 58.2% versus a gain of 29.8%. Over five years, SENEB leads with a +242.6% price change compared with +3.7% for CENT. Central Garden & Pet is the larger company by market cap ($2.51 billion vs $1.19 billion), about 2.1 times the size.
On valuation, Seneca Foods trades at a lower trailing P/E (10.1x vs 14.9x for Central Garden & Pet).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CENT | SENEB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $40.15 | $175.58 |
| Market cap | $2.51B | $1.19B |
| 1-day change | +0.32% | -2.58% |
| YTD return | +24.88% | +60.26% |
| 1-year return | +29.81% | +58.18% |
| 5-year return | +3.70% | +242.60% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.87 | 10.14 |
| Forward P/E | 13.14 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.70 | $17.32 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.13B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.23% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $162.84M | — |
| Gross margin | 31.87% | — |
| Operating margin | 7.99% | — |
| Net margin | 5.20% | — |
| 52-week high | $46.97 | $208.53 |
| 52-week low | $28.77 | $108.68 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.52% | -15.80% |
| Analyst consensus | none | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.00% | — |
| Average volume | 98.02K | 153 |
| Shares outstanding | 9.65M | 1.55M |
| Employees | 6,000 | 2,900 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Consumer Specialties | Packaged Foods |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Central Garden & Pet is about 2.1 times larger than Seneca Foods by market value ($2.51B vs $1.19B).
- SENEB has outperformed CENT by 28.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Central Garden & Pet trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.9x vs 10.1x trailing P/E).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Central Garden & Pet in Consumer Discretionary and Seneca Foods in Consumer Staples.
About Central Garden & Pet
CENT stock →Central Garden & Pet Company produces and distributes various products for the lawn and garden, and pet supplies markets in the United States. It operates through two segments: Pet and Garden.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Specialties · 6,000 employees
About Seneca Foods
SENEB stock →Seneca Foods Corporation provides packaged fruits and vegetables in the United States and internationally. The company offers canned, frozen, and jarred fruits and vegetables; and packaged snack chips and other food products under the private label, as well as under various national and regional brands that the company owns or licenses, including Aunt Nellie's, CherryMan, Green Giant, Green Valley, Libby's, READ, and Seneca.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 2,900 employees
CENT vs SENEB FAQ
Which is bigger, Central Garden & Pet or Seneca Foods?
Central Garden & Pet (CENT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.51B compared with $1.19B for Seneca Foods (SENEB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CENT or SENEB?
SENEB returned +58.18% over the past 12 months, compared with +29.81% for CENT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CENT or SENEB?
SENEB has the lower trailing P/E at 10.1, versus 14.9 for CENT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Central Garden & Pet and Seneca Foods in the same industry?
No. Central Garden & Pet is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Seneca Foods is in Consumer Staples.