Central Garden & Pet (CENTA) vs Fossil Group (FOSL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Fossil Group (FOSL) has outperformed Central Garden & Pet (CENTA) over the past year, gaining 184.6% versus a gain of 27.1%. Over five years, CENTA leads with a -2.7% price change compared with -43.8% for FOSL. Central Garden & Pet is the larger company by market cap ($2.19 billion vs $424.6 million), about 5.2 times the size.
On valuation, Central Garden & Pet trades at a lower forward P/E (11.5x vs 55.2x for Fossil Group).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CENTA | FOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.03 | $7.18 |
| Market cap | $2.19B | $424.61M |
| 1-day change | +0.03% | +2.57% |
| YTD return | +19.97% | +86.17% |
| 1-year return | +27.11% | +184.55% |
| 5-year return | -2.68% | -43.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.97 | — |
| Forward P/E | 11.46 | 55.23 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.70 | $-1.27 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.13B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.23% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $162.84M | — |
| Gross margin | 31.87% | — |
| Operating margin | 7.99% | — |
| Net margin | 5.20% | — |
| 52-week high | $40.80 | $7.33 |
| 52-week low | $25.97 | $1.70 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.14% | -2.05% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.03% | +25.35% |
| Average volume | 300.02K | 886.64K |
| Shares outstanding | 51.34M | 59.14M |
| Employees | 6,000 | 4,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Consumer Specialties | Consumer Specialties |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Central Garden & Pet is about 5.2 times larger than Fossil Group by market value ($2.19B vs $424.61M).
- FOSL has outperformed CENTA by 157.4 percentage points over the past year.
About Central Garden & Pet
CENTA stock →Central Garden & Pet Company produces and distributes various products for the lawn and garden, and pet supplies markets in the United States. It operates through two segments: Pet and Garden.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Specialties · 6,000 employees
About Fossil Group
FOSL stock →Fossil Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company's products include traditional watches, smartwatches, jewelry, handbags, small leather goods, belts, and sunglasses.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Specialties · 4,500 employees
CENTA vs FOSL FAQ
Which is bigger, Central Garden & Pet or Fossil Group?
Central Garden & Pet (CENTA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.19B compared with $424.61M for Fossil Group (FOSL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CENTA or FOSL?
FOSL returned +184.55% over the past 12 months, compared with +27.11% for CENTA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Central Garden & Pet and Fossil Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Consumer Specialties industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.