Centerra Gold (CGAU) vs SSR Mining (SSRM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Centerra Gold (CGAU) has outperformed SSR Mining (SSRM) over the past year, gaining 85.4% versus a gain of 40.9%. Over five years, CGAU leads with a +174.7% price change compared with +105.1% for SSRM. SSR Mining is the larger company by market cap ($6.68 billion vs $4.14 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, SSR Mining trades at a lower forward P/E (7.2x vs 11.1x for Centerra Gold). Centerra Gold offers the higher dividend yield (0.95% vs 0.09%). SSR Mining converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 24.3% versus -7.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CGAU | SSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $21.15 | $32.75 |
| Market cap | $4.14B | $6.68B |
| 1-day change | -2.49% | -4.46% |
| YTD return | +47.18% | +49.41% |
| 1-year return | +85.36% | +40.86% |
| 5-year return | +174.68% | +105.07% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 6.71 | 10.99 |
| Forward P/E | 11.06 | 7.21 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.15 | $2.98 |
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 0.09% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.03 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.09B | $1.63B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +28.78% | +63.68% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-81.28M | $395.75M |
| Gross margin | 24.11% | 59.91% |
| Operating margin | 1.63% | 28.32% |
| Net margin | -7.42% | 24.28% |
| 52-week high | $24.52 | $39.44 |
| 52-week low | $10.46 | $18.19 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.74% | -16.96% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -17.26% | +31.91% |
| Average volume | 1.44M | 2.71M |
| Shares outstanding | 195.61M | 203.91M |
| Employees | — | 2,900 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Industrials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CGAU has outperformed SSRM by 44.5 percentage points over the past year.
- SSR Mining trades at a higher earnings multiple (11.0x vs 6.7x trailing P/E).
- SSR Mining is more profitable, keeping 24.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -7.4 cents for Centerra Gold.
- SSR Mining grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+63.68% vs +28.78%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Centerra Gold in Basic Materials and SSR Mining in Industrials.
About Centerra Gold
CGAU stock →Centerra Gold Inc. engages in the operation, development, exploration, and acquisition of gold and copper properties in North America, Turkey, and internationally.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About SSR Mining
SSRM stock →SSR Mining Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of precious metal resource properties in the United States, Türkiye, Canada, and Argentina. The company explores for gold doré, copper, silver, lead, and zinc deposits.
Industrials · Precious Metals · 2,900 employees
CGAU vs SSRM FAQ
Which is bigger, Centerra Gold or SSR Mining?
SSR Mining (SSRM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.68B compared with $4.14B for Centerra Gold (CGAU).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CGAU or SSRM?
CGAU returned +85.36% over the past 12 months, compared with +40.86% for SSRM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CGAU or SSRM?
CGAU has the lower trailing P/E at 6.7, versus 11.0 for SSRM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Centerra Gold or SSR Mining?
Centerra Gold has the higher yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.09% for SSR Mining.
Are Centerra Gold and SSR Mining in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.