MetaCap

Church & Dwight (CHD) vs e.l.f. Beauty (ELF)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Church & Dwight (CHD) has outperformed e.l.f. Beauty (ELF) over the past year, gaining 8.1% versus a loss of 24.4%. Over five years, ELF leads with a +264.9% price change compared with +16.6% for CHD. Church & Dwight is the larger company by market cap ($22.95 billion vs $6.20 billion), about 3.7 times the size, while e.l.f. Beauty is growing revenue faster (+24.6% vs +1.6%).

On valuation, Church & Dwight trades at a lower forward P/E (24.0x vs 27.2x for e.l.f. Beauty). Church & Dwight pays a dividend yielding 1.25%, while e.l.f. Beauty does not currently pay one. Church & Dwight converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.9% versus 1.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CHD+9.47%ELF-23.19%
+23%-23%-68%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CHD+17.03%ELF+258.47%
+667%+303%-61%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CHD versus ELF key metrics
MetricCHDELF
Share price$96.75$105.03
Market cap$22.95B$6.20B
1-day change+0.22%+2.18%
YTD return+16.05%+39.73%
1-year return+8.11%-24.43%
5-year return+16.61%+264.87%
P/E ratio (TTM)31.01107.17
Forward P/E23.9727.17
EPS (TTM)$3.12$0.98
Dividend yield1.25%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.21$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$6.20B$1.64B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.57%+24.59%
Net income (latest FY)$736.80M$26.32M
Gross margin44.73%70.72%
Operating margin17.37%4.50%
Net margin11.88%1.61%
52-week high$106.04$147.75
52-week low$81.33$48.82
Distance from 52-week high-8.76%-28.91%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+8.36%-0.03%
Average volume1.82M1.95M
Shares outstanding237.20M59.01M
Employees5,550849
SectorConsumer DefensiveConsumer Defensive
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsHousehold & Personal Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Church & Dwight is about 3.7 times larger than e.l.f. Beauty by market value ($22.95B vs $6.20B).
  • CHD has outperformed ELF by 32.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • e.l.f. Beauty trades at a higher earnings multiple (107.2x vs 31.0x trailing P/E).
  • Church & Dwight offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.25% vs 0.00%).
  • Church & Dwight is more profitable, keeping 11.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.6 cents for e.l.f. Beauty.
  • e.l.f. Beauty grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.59% vs +1.57%).

About Church & Dwight

CHD stock →

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. develops, manufactures, and markets household, personal care, and specialty products.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 5,550 employees

About e.l.f. Beauty

ELF stock →

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc., a beauty company, provides cosmetics and skin care products worldwide.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 849 employees

CHD vs ELF FAQ

Which is bigger, Church & Dwight or e.l.f. Beauty?

Church & Dwight (CHD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $22.95B compared with $6.20B for e.l.f. Beauty (ELF).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHD or ELF?

CHD returned +8.11% over the past 12 months, compared with -24.43% for ELF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHD or ELF?

CHD has the lower trailing P/E at 31.0, versus 107.2 for ELF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Church & Dwight or e.l.f. Beauty?

Church & Dwight pays a dividend yielding 1.25%, while e.l.f. Beauty does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Church & Dwight and e.l.f. Beauty in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.

More comparisons