Churchill Downs (CHDN) vs Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group (LLYVA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group (LLYVA) has outperformed Churchill Downs (CHDN) over the past year, gaining 7.3% versus a loss of 19.2%. Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group is the larger company by market cap ($8.71 billion vs $5.15 billion), about 1.7 times the size. On valuation, Churchill Downs trades at a lower forward P/E (10.0x vs 50.9x for Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group).
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group does not currently pay one. Churchill Downs converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.1% versus -22.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHDN | LLYVA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $73.95 | $94.69 |
| Market cap | $5.15B | $8.71B |
| 1-day change | -5.45% | -1.62% |
| YTD return | -35.01% | +16.18% |
| 1-year return | -19.19% | +7.30% |
| 5-year return | -41.82% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.62 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.01 | 50.91 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.86 | $-4.79 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.438 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.93B | $381.95M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.01% | +12.18% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $383.00M | $-86.97M |
| Gross margin | — | 19.25% |
| Operating margin | 23.37% | -13.54% |
| Net margin | 13.09% | -22.77% |
| 52-week high | $118.35 | $106.06 |
| 52-week low | $73.44 | $74.38 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.52% | -10.72% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +76.92% | — |
| Average volume | 1.05M | 145.49K |
| Shares outstanding | 69.70M | 25.57M |
| Employees | 6,600 | 300 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- LLYVA has outperformed CHDN by 26.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Churchill Downs is more profitable, keeping 13.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -22.8 cents for Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group.
- Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.18% vs +7.01%).
About Churchill Downs
CHDN stock →Churchill Downs Incorporated operates live and historical racing entertainment venues, online wagering businesses, and regional casino gaming properties in the United States. It operates through three segments: Live and Historical Racing, Wagering Services and Solutions, and Gaming.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 6,600 employees
About Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group
LLYVA stock →Liberty Live Holdings, Inc. operates as a live entertainment company.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 300 employees
CHDN vs LLYVA FAQ
Which is bigger, Churchill Downs or Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group?
Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group (LLYVA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.71B compared with $5.15B for Churchill Downs (CHDN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHDN or LLYVA?
LLYVA returned +7.30% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.19% for CHDN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Churchill Downs or Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group?
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Churchill Downs and Liberty Live Series A Liberty Live Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.