Churchill Downs (CHDN) vs Manchester United (MANU)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Manchester United (MANU) has outperformed Churchill Downs (CHDN) over the past year, gaining 33.1% versus a loss of 19.2%. Over five years, MANU leads with a +21.9% price change compared with -41.8% for CHDN. Churchill Downs is the larger company by market cap ($5.15 billion vs $3.49 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Churchill Downs trades at a lower forward P/E (10.0x vs 84.8x for Manchester United). Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Manchester United does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHDN | MANU |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $73.95 | $20.25 |
| Market cap | $5.15B | $3.49B |
| 1-day change | -5.45% | -0.74% |
| YTD return | -35.01% | +27.20% |
| 1-year return | -19.19% | +33.14% |
| 5-year return | -41.82% | +21.91% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.35 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.01 | 84.81 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.54 | $-33.18 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.438 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.93B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.01% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $383.00M | — |
| Operating margin | 23.37% | — |
| Net margin | 13.09% | — |
| 52-week high | $118.35 | $24.45 |
| 52-week low | $73.44 | $14.85 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.52% | -17.18% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +76.92% | +12.89% |
| Average volume | 1.04M | 327.63K |
| Shares outstanding | 69.70M | 56.14M |
| Employees | 6,600 | 805 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Communication Services |
| Industry | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation | Entertainment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MANU has outperformed CHDN by 52.3 percentage points over the past year.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Churchill Downs in Consumer Discretionary and Manchester United in Communication Services.
About Churchill Downs
CHDN stock →Churchill Downs Incorporated operates live and historical racing entertainment venues, online wagering businesses, and regional casino gaming properties in the United States. It operates through three segments: Live and Historical Racing, Wagering Services and Solutions, and Gaming.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 6,600 employees
About Manchester United
MANU stock →Manchester United plc, together with its subsidiaries, operates a professional sports team in the United Kingdom. The company is involved in marketing and sponsorship relationships with international and regional companies to commercialize its brand.
Communication Services · Entertainment · 805 employees
CHDN vs MANU FAQ
Which is bigger, Churchill Downs or Manchester United?
Churchill Downs (CHDN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.15B compared with $3.49B for Manchester United (MANU).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHDN or MANU?
MANU returned +33.14% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.19% for CHDN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Churchill Downs or Manchester United?
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Manchester United does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Churchill Downs and Manchester United in the same industry?
No. Churchill Downs is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Manchester United is in Communication Services.