Churchill Downs (CHDN) vs Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) has outperformed Churchill Downs (CHDN) over the past year, gaining 84.5% versus a loss of 19.2%. Over five years, MSGS leads with a +115.6% price change compared with -41.8% for CHDN. Madison Square Garden Sports is the larger company by market cap ($9.75 billion vs $5.15 billion), about 1.9 times the size.
On valuation, Churchill Downs trades at a lower trailing P/E (13.3x vs 1265.5x for Madison Square Garden Sports). Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Madison Square Garden Sports does not currently pay one. Churchill Downs converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.1% versus 0.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHDN | MSGS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $73.95 | $404.97 |
| Market cap | $5.15B | $9.75B |
| 1-day change | -5.45% | +0.72% |
| YTD return | -35.01% | +56.57% |
| 1-year return | -19.19% | +84.50% |
| 5-year return | -41.82% | +115.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.35 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.01 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.54 | $0.32 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.438 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.93B | $1.15B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.01% | +11.03% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $383.00M | $7.76M |
| Operating margin | 23.37% | 2.50% |
| Net margin | 13.09% | 0.67% |
| 52-week high | $118.35 | $438.93 |
| 52-week low | $73.44 | $207.90 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.52% | -7.74% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +76.92% | +18.69% |
| Average volume | 1.04M | 241.59K |
| Shares outstanding | 69.70M | 19.55M |
| Employees | 6,600 | 522 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MSGS has outperformed CHDN by 103.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Churchill Downs is more profitable, keeping 13.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.7 cents for Madison Square Garden Sports.
About Churchill Downs
CHDN stock →Churchill Downs Incorporated operates live and historical racing entertainment venues, online wagering businesses, and regional casino gaming properties in the United States. It operates through three segments: Live and Historical Racing, Wagering Services and Solutions, and Gaming.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 6,600 employees
About Madison Square Garden Sports
MSGS stock →Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. operates as a professional sports company in the United States.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 522 employees
CHDN vs MSGS FAQ
Which is bigger, Churchill Downs or Madison Square Garden Sports?
Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.75B compared with $5.15B for Churchill Downs (CHDN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHDN or MSGS?
MSGS returned +84.50% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.19% for CHDN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Churchill Downs or Madison Square Garden Sports?
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.59%, while Madison Square Garden Sports does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Churchill Downs and Madison Square Garden Sports in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.