ChronoScale (CHRN) vs LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES (LPL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
ChronoScale (CHRN) has outperformed LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES (LPL) over the past year, gaining 266.1% versus a loss of 45.5%. Over five years, LPL leads with a -61.8% price change compared with -68.0% for CHRN. LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES is the larger company by market cap ($2.95 billion vs $2.88 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5.5% versus -70.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHRN | LPL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $19.77 | $2.95 |
| Market cap | $2.88B | $2.95B |
| 1-day change | +2.54% | -4.53% |
| YTD return | +128.82% | -29.93% |
| 1-year return | +266.11% | -45.47% |
| 5-year return | -68.01% | -61.79% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.36 | $-0.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $71.60M | $17.22B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +459.45% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-50.32M | $954.48M |
| Gross margin | -23.86% | 11.04% |
| Operating margin | -52.37% | 3.47% |
| Net margin | -70.28% | 5.54% |
| 52-week high | $30.00 | $5.83 |
| 52-week low | $3.50 | $2.76 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -34.10% | -49.40% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +61.86% | +46.10% |
| Average volume | 189.34K | 2.78M |
| Shares outstanding | 145.64M | 1.00B |
| Employees | 84 | 23,490 |
| Sector | Industrials | Technology |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CHRN has outperformed LPL by 311.6 percentage points over the past year.
- LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES is more profitable, keeping 5.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -70.3 cents for ChronoScale.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: ChronoScale in Industrials and LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES in Technology.
About ChronoScale
CHRN stock →ChronoScale Holdings Corporation designs and develops a compute platform to support artificial intelligence (AI) workloads in the United States. The company focuses on large-scale deployments and provides dedicated compute environments engineered for performance, consistency, and long-term operational execution.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 84 employees
About LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES
LPL stock →LG Display Co., Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the research, development, manufacture, and sale of organic light-emitting diode (OLED) and thin-film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) panels in South Korea, China, the rest of Asia, North America, and Europe. The company offers display panels for televisions; monitors; IT products comprising notebook computers, desktop monitors, and tablet computers; laptops; smartphones and smartwatches; mobile phones and watches; automobiles; and other products with display devices.
Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 23,490 employees
CHRN vs LPL FAQ
Which is bigger, ChronoScale or LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES?
LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES (LPL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.95B compared with $2.88B for ChronoScale (CHRN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHRN or LPL?
CHRN returned +266.11% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.47% for LPL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are ChronoScale and LG Display AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.