MetaCap

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs Rogers Communication (RCI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has outperformed Rogers Communication (RCI) over the past year, gaining 4.8% versus a loss of 14.7%. Over five years, CHT leads with a +15.1% price change compared with -37.7% for RCI. Chunghwa Telecom is the larger company by market cap ($35.51 billion vs $16.57 billion), about 2.1 times the size.

On valuation, Rogers Communication trades at a lower forward P/E (9.1x vs 29.2x for Chunghwa Telecom). Chunghwa Telecom offers the higher dividend yield (11.36% vs 6.52%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CHT+4.81%RCI-14.73%
+16%-0%-17%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CHT+15.78%RCI-35.53%
+29%-12%-52%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CHT versus RCI key metrics
MetricCHTRCI
Share price$45.78$30.68
Market cap$35.51B$16.57B
1-day change-0.65%+0.43%
YTD return+9.76%-19.04%
1-year return+4.81%-14.73%
5-year return+15.14%-37.74%
P/E ratio (TTM)27.913.72
Forward P/E29.209.07
EPS (TTM)$1.64$8.25
Dividend yield11.36%6.52%
Annual dividend$5.20$2.00
Revenue (latest FY)$7.01B—
Revenue growth (YoY)-3.79%—
Net income (latest FY)$1.13B—
Gross margin36.26%—
Operating margin20.38%—
Net margin16.17%—
52-week high$46.48$41.14
52-week low$39.28$30.02
Distance from 52-week high-1.51%-25.43%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+5.02%+26.30%
Average volume211.64K1.29M
Shares outstanding775.74M429.08M
Employees—25,000
SectorCommunication ServicesTelecommunications
IndustryTelecom ServicesCable & Other Pay Television Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Chunghwa Telecom is about 2.1 times larger than Rogers Communication by market value ($35.51B vs $16.57B).
  • CHT has outperformed RCI by 19.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Chunghwa Telecom trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.9x vs 3.7x trailing P/E).
  • Chunghwa Telecom offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.36% vs 6.52%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Chunghwa Telecom in Communication Services and Rogers Communication in Telecommunications.

About Chunghwa Telecom

CHT stock →

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an integrated telecommunications service provider in Taiwan and internationally. The company operates through Consumer Business, Enterprise Business, International Business, and Others segments.

Communication Services · Telecom Services

About Rogers Communication

RCI stock →

Rogers Communications Inc. operates as a communications, sports, and entertainment company in Canada.

Telecommunications · Cable & Other Pay Television Services · 25,000 employees

CHT vs RCI FAQ

Which is bigger, Chunghwa Telecom or Rogers Communication?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $35.51B compared with $16.57B for Rogers Communication (RCI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHT or RCI?

CHT returned +4.81% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.73% for RCI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHT or RCI?

RCI has the lower trailing P/E at 3.7, versus 27.9 for CHT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Chunghwa Telecom or Rogers Communication?

Chunghwa Telecom has the higher yield at 11.36%, compared with 6.52% for Rogers Communication.

Are Chunghwa Telecom and Rogers Communication in the same industry?

No. Chunghwa Telecom is in the Communication Services sector, while Rogers Communication is in Telecommunications.

More comparisons