MetaCap

Charter Communications (CHTR) vs Liberty Global (LBTYK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Liberty Global (LBTYK) has outperformed Charter Communications (CHTR) over the past year, losing 22.4% versus a loss of 61.3%. Over five years, LBTYK leads with a -42.0% price change compared with -84.7% for CHTR. Charter Communications is the larger company by market cap ($13.90 billion vs $3.04 billion), about 4.6 times the size, while Liberty Global is growing revenue faster (+12.4% vs -0.6%).

Charter Communications converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.1% versus -146.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CHTR-61.31%LBTYK-22.43%
+14%-26%-65%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CHTR-84.85%LBTYK-41.87%
+8%-41%-89%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CHTR versus LBTYK key metrics
MetricCHTRLBTYK
Share price$106.96$8.92
Market cap$13.90B$3.04B
1-day change-1.55%-0.28%
YTD return-48.76%-19.20%
1-year return-61.31%-22.43%
5-year return-84.70%-41.97%
P/E ratio (TTM)2.83—
Forward P/E2.27—
EPS (TTM)$37.82$-8.92
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$54.77B$4.88B
Revenue growth (YoY)-0.56%+12.36%
Net income (latest FY)$4.99B$-7.14B
Gross margin—65.76%
Operating margin23.57%-0.48%
Net margin9.10%-146.32%
52-week high$275.58$13.12
52-week low$104.91$8.65
Distance from 52-week high-61.19%-32.01%
Analyst consensushold—
Avg. price target upside+63.72%—
Average volume2.94M1.53M
Shares outstanding114.46M151.40M
Employees91,9006,636
SectorTelecommunicationsTelecommunications
IndustryCable & Other Pay Television ServicesCable & Other Pay Television Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Charter Communications is about 4.6 times larger than Liberty Global by market value ($13.90B vs $3.04B).
  • LBTYK has outperformed CHTR by 38.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Charter Communications is more profitable, keeping 9.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -146.3 cents for Liberty Global.
  • Liberty Global grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.36% vs -0.56%).

About Charter Communications

CHTR stock →

Charter Communications, Inc. operates as a broadband connectivity company in the United States.

Telecommunications · Cable & Other Pay Television Services · 91,900 employees

About Liberty Global

LBTYK stock →

Liberty Global Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides broadband internet, video, fixed-line telephony, and mobile communications services to residential and business customers in Europe. It offers intelligent WiFi and broadband internet services, such as ONE Connect, which enables fast and flexible introductions of new hardware and services, as well as cloud-to-cloud open API integration; Smart Security that provides network security, safe browsing and fraud prevention measures; Smart Home, which provides enhanced entertainment and home automation and security services; and Connect Box, an intelligent WiFi and telephony gateway.

Telecommunications · Cable & Other Pay Television Services · 6,636 employees

CHTR vs LBTYK FAQ

Which is bigger, Charter Communications or Liberty Global?

Charter Communications (CHTR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $13.90B compared with $3.04B for Liberty Global (LBTYK).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHTR or LBTYK?

LBTYK returned -22.43% over the past 12 months, compared with -61.31% for CHTR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Are Charter Communications and Liberty Global in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Cable & Other Pay Television Services industry within the Telecommunications sector.

More comparisons