Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs NYLIM MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund (MMD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
On valuation, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.8x vs 9.8x for NYLIM MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund). Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (7.43% vs 5.39%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHW | MMD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $8.07 | $13.64 |
| 1-day change | -0.74% | -0.18% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 9.81 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.85 | $1.39 |
| Dividend yield | 7.43% | 5.39% |
| Annual dividend | $0.60 | $0.735 |
| 52-week high | $9.18 | $15.82 |
| 52-week low | $6.98 | $13.24 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.09% | -13.81% |
| Average volume | 192.89K | 72.13K |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- NYLIM MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (9.8x vs 2.8x trailing P/E).
- Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.43% vs 5.39%).
CHW vs MMD FAQ
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHW or MMD?
CHW has the lower trailing P/E at 2.8, versus 9.8 for MMD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or NYLIM MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund?
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund has the higher yield at 7.43%, compared with 5.39% for NYLIM MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund.
Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and NYLIM MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.