MetaCap

Cigna Group (CI) vs Quest Diagnostics (DGX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Quest Diagnostics (DGX) has outperformed Cigna Group (CI) over the past year, gaining 24.8% versus a loss of 9.3%. Over five years, DGX leads with a +59.3% price change compared with +35.1% for CI. Cigna Group is the larger company by market cap ($73.59 billion vs $25.06 billion), about 2.9 times the size, while Quest Diagnostics is growing revenue faster (+11.8% vs +11.2%).

On valuation, Cigna Group trades at a lower forward P/E (8.3x vs 18.8x for Quest Diagnostics). Cigna Group offers the higher dividend yield (2.20% vs 1.46%). Quest Diagnostics converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.0% versus 2.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CI-9.32%DGX+24.83%
+39%+8%-23%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CI+35.74%DGX+59.98%
+82%+32%-19%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CI versus DGX key metrics
MetricCIDGX
Share price$278.51$227.06
Market cap$73.59B$25.06B
1-day change+1.51%-0.58%
YTD return+1.19%+30.85%
1-year return-9.32%+24.83%
5-year return+35.07%+59.34%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.5124.10
Forward P/E8.3118.84
EPS (TTM)$24.19$9.42
Dividend yield2.20%1.46%
Annual dividend$6.14$3.32
Revenue (latest FY)$274.90B$11.04B
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.24%+11.78%
Net income (latest FY)$5.96B$992.00M
Gross margin21.79%33.21%
Operating margin3.35%14.10%
Net margin2.17%8.99%
52-week high$312.18$248.84
52-week low$239.51$171.18
Distance from 52-week high-10.79%-8.75%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+22.90%+9.25%
Average volume1.67M1.04M
Shares outstanding264.24M110.37M
Employees65,66946,000
SectorHealth CareHealth Care
IndustryMedical SpecialitiesMedical Specialities

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Cigna Group is about 2.9 times larger than Quest Diagnostics by market value ($73.59B vs $25.06B).
  • DGX has outperformed CI by 34.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Quest Diagnostics trades at a higher earnings multiple (24.1x vs 11.5x trailing P/E).
  • Quest Diagnostics is more profitable, keeping 9.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.2 cents for Cigna Group.

About Cigna Group

CI stock →

The Cigna Group, together with its subsidiaries, provides insurance and related products and services in the United States. It operates through two segments: Evernorth Health Services and Cigna Healthcare.

Health Care · Medical Specialities · 65,669 employees

About Quest Diagnostics

DGX stock →

Quest Diagnostics Incorporated provides diagnostic testing and services in the United States. The company develops and delivers diagnostic information services, such as routine, non-routine and advanced clinical testing, anatomic pathology testing, and other diagnostic information services.

Health Care · Medical Specialities · 46,000 employees

CI vs DGX FAQ

Which is bigger, Cigna Group or Quest Diagnostics?

Cigna Group (CI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $73.59B compared with $25.06B for Quest Diagnostics (DGX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CI or DGX?

DGX returned +24.83% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.32% for CI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CI or DGX?

CI has the lower trailing P/E at 11.5, versus 24.1 for DGX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Cigna Group or Quest Diagnostics?

Cigna Group has the higher yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.46% for Quest Diagnostics.

Are Cigna Group and Quest Diagnostics in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Medical Specialities industry within the Health Care sector.

More comparisons