MetaCap

Ciena (CIEN) vs Ubiquiti (UI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Ciena (CIEN) has outperformed Ubiquiti (UI) over the past year, gaining 195.5% versus a loss of 5.1%. Over five years, CIEN leads with a +756.6% price change compared with +99.6% for UI. Ciena is the larger company by market cap ($63.31 billion vs $38.41 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Ubiquiti is growing revenue faster (+27.2% vs +18.8%).

On valuation, Ubiquiti trades at a lower forward P/E (32.4x vs 37.7x for Ciena). Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Ciena does not currently pay one. Ubiquiti converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.3% versus 2.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CIEN+192.05%UI-4.01%
+326%+143%-39%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CIEN+750.89%UI+106.64%
+1064%+472%-119%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CIEN versus UI key metrics
MetricCIENUI
Share price$446.45$634.66
Market cap$63.31B$38.41B
1-day change+0.63%+1.31%
YTD return+91.38%+15.18%
1-year return+195.46%-5.13%
5-year return+756.59%+99.65%
P/E ratio (TTM)99.8838.94
Forward P/E37.7432.42
EPS (TTM)$4.47$16.30
Dividend yield0.00%0.54%
Annual dividend$0.00$3.40
Revenue (latest FY)$4.77B$3.27B
Revenue growth (YoY)+18.79%+27.22%
Net income (latest FY)$123.34M$960.30M
Gross margin42.04%46.16%
Operating margin4.14%36.21%
Net margin2.59%29.33%
52-week high$637.51$1,099.99
52-week low$152.54$500.23
Distance from 52-week high-29.97%-42.30%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+14.90%+15.73%
Average volume2.35M131.89K
Shares outstanding141.81M60.53M
Employees8,8981,818
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CIEN has outperformed UI by 200.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ciena trades at a higher earnings multiple (99.9x vs 38.9x trailing P/E).
  • Ubiquiti is more profitable, keeping 29.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.6 cents for Ciena.
  • Ubiquiti grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+27.22% vs +18.79%).

About Ciena

CIEN stock →

Ciena Corporation, a network technology company, provides hardware, software, and services for various network operators in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Japan, and India. It operates through Networking Platforms, Platform Software and Services, Blue Planet Automation Software and Services, and Global Services segments.

Technology · Communication Equipment · 8,898 employees

About Ubiquiti

UI stock →

Ubiquiti Inc. engages in the development of networking technology for service providers, enterprises, and consumers in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, South America.

Technology · Communication Equipment · 1,818 employees

CIEN vs UI FAQ

Which is bigger, Ciena or Ubiquiti?

Ciena (CIEN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $63.31B compared with $38.41B for Ubiquiti (UI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CIEN or UI?

CIEN returned +195.46% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.13% for UI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CIEN or UI?

UI has the lower trailing P/E at 38.9, versus 99.9 for CIEN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Ciena or Ubiquiti?

Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Ciena does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Ciena and Ubiquiti in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Communication Equipment industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons