Ericsson (ERIC) vs Ubiquiti (UI)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Ericsson (ERIC) has outperformed Ubiquiti (UI) over the past year, gaining 12.2% versus a loss of 5.5%. Over five years, UI leads with a +98.8% price change compared with -22.3% for ERIC. Ubiquiti is the larger company by market cap ($38.41 billion vs $30.78 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Ericsson trades at a lower forward P/E (15.4x vs 32.4x for Ubiquiti). Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.54%, while Ericsson does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ERIC | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.46 | $634.66 |
| Market cap | $30.78B | $38.41B |
| 1-day change | +0.32% | +1.31% |
| YTD return | -1.97% | +14.69% |
| 1-year return | +12.22% | -5.53% |
| 5-year return | -22.33% | +98.80% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 11.97 | 38.94 |
| Forward P/E | 15.44 | 32.42 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.79 | $16.30 |
| Dividend yield | 3.39% | 0.54% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $3.40 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $3.27B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +27.22% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $960.30M |
| Gross margin | — | 46.16% |
| Operating margin | — | 36.21% |
| Net margin | — | 29.33% |
| 52-week high | $13.77 | $1,099.99 |
| 52-week low | $8.12 | $500.23 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.30% | -42.30% |
| Analyst consensus | underperform | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.37% | +15.73% |
| Average volume | 11.03M | 131.89K |
| Shares outstanding | 2.99B | 60.53M |
| Employees | 86,536 | 1,818 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment | Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ERIC has outperformed UI by 17.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Ubiquiti trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.9x vs 12.0x trailing P/E).
- Ericsson offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.39% vs 0.54%).
About Ericsson
ERIC stock →Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), together with its subsidiaries, provides mobile connectivity solutions to communications service providers, enterprises, and the public sector in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania, and India. It operates through Networks; Cloud Software and Services; Enterprise; and Other segments.
Technology · Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment · 86,536 employees
About Ubiquiti
UI stock →Ubiquiti Inc. engages in the development of networking technology for service providers, enterprises, and consumers in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, South America.
Technology · Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment · 1,818 employees
ERIC vs UI FAQ
Which is bigger, Ericsson or Ubiquiti?
Ubiquiti (UI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $38.41B compared with $30.78B for Ericsson (ERIC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ERIC or UI?
ERIC returned +12.22% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.53% for UI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ERIC or UI?
ERIC has the lower trailing P/E at 12.0, versus 38.9 for UI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Ericsson or Ubiquiti?
Ericsson has the higher yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.54% for Ubiquiti.
Are Ericsson and Ubiquiti in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment industry within the Technology sector.