Cellebrite DI (CLBT) vs SoundHound AI (SOUN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Cellebrite DI (CLBT) has outperformed SoundHound AI (SOUN) over the past year, losing 40.3% versus a loss of 70.8%. Cellebrite DI is the larger company by market cap ($2.85 billion vs $2.45 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while SoundHound AI is growing revenue faster (+99.4% vs +18.6%). Cellebrite DI converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.5% versus -8.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLBT | SOUN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $11.34 | $5.52 |
| Market cap | $2.85B | $2.45B |
| 1-day change | +1.02% | -1.95% |
| YTD return | -37.10% | -44.63% |
| 1-year return | -40.28% | -70.76% |
| 5-year return | +9.35% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 49.30 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.36 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.23 | $-0.62 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $475.68M | $168.92M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.56% | +99.45% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $78.33M | $-14.01M |
| Gross margin | 84.20% | 42.36% |
| Operating margin | 13.98% | -13.78% |
| Net margin | 16.47% | -8.29% |
| 52-week high | $19.98 | $22.17 |
| 52-week low | $9.58 | $5.46 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -43.24% | -75.10% |
| Analyst consensus | none | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.45% | +127.72% |
| Average volume | 2.96M | 27.46M |
| Shares outstanding | 251.34M | 411.58M |
| Employees | 1,285 | 954 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CLBT has outperformed SOUN by 30.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Cellebrite DI is more profitable, keeping 16.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -8.3 cents for SoundHound AI.
- SoundHound AI grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+99.45% vs +18.56%).
About Cellebrite DI
CLBT stock →Cellebrite DI Ltd. develops software and services for legally sanctioned investigations in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Americas, and the Asia-Pacific.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 1,285 employees
About SoundHound AI
SOUN stock →SoundHound AI, Inc. provides independent voice artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that enables businesses across the automotive, TV, IoT, and customer service industries to deliver conversational experiences to customers in the United States, Korea, France, Japan, Germany, and internationally.
Technology · Computer Software: Prepackaged Software · 954 employees
CLBT vs SOUN FAQ
Which is bigger, Cellebrite DI or SoundHound AI?
Cellebrite DI (CLBT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.85B compared with $2.45B for SoundHound AI (SOUN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLBT or SOUN?
CLBT returned -40.28% over the past 12 months, compared with -70.76% for SOUN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Cellebrite DI and SoundHound AI in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry within the Technology sector.