Celestica (CLS) vs Jabil (JBL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Celestica (CLS) has outperformed Jabil (JBL) over the past year, gaining 55.7% versus a gain of 47.8%. Over five years, CLS leads with a +3873.4% price change compared with +380.2% for JBL. Celestica is the larger company by market cap ($46.86 billion vs $31.38 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Jabil trades at a lower forward P/E (13.5x vs 18.9x for Celestica). Jabil pays a dividend yielding 0.11%, while Celestica does not currently pay one. Celestica converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.7% versus 2.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLS | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $371.57 | $299.47 |
| Market cap | $46.86B | $31.38B |
| 1-day change | -4.29% | -3.14% |
| YTD return | +25.27% | +31.33% |
| 1-year return | +55.73% | +47.80% |
| 5-year return | +3873.39% | +380.23% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 38.58 | 30.71 |
| Forward P/E | 18.91 | 13.51 |
| EPS (TTM) | $9.63 | $9.75 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.32 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.39B | $29.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +28.46% | +3.18% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $832.50M | $657.00M |
| Gross margin | 12.06% | 8.88% |
| Operating margin | 8.40% | 3.97% |
| Net margin | 6.72% | 2.20% |
| 52-week high | $474.03 | $428.93 |
| 52-week low | $238.23 | $189.60 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -21.61% | -30.18% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +27.54% | +41.92% |
| Average volume | 2.50M | 1.17M |
| Shares outstanding | 126.11M | 104.79M |
| Employees | 23,803 | — |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Celestica trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.6x vs 30.7x trailing P/E).
- Celestica grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+28.46% vs +3.18%).
About Celestica
CLS stock →Celestica Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides supply chain solutions in Asia, North America, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Advanced Technology Solutions, and Connectivity and Cloud Solutions.
Technology · Electrical Products · 23,803 employees
About Jabil
JBL stock →Jabil Inc. provides engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions worldwide.
Technology · Electrical Products
CLS vs JBL FAQ
Which is bigger, Celestica or Jabil?
Celestica (CLS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $46.86B compared with $31.38B for Jabil (JBL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLS or JBL?
CLS returned +55.73% over the past 12 months, compared with +47.80% for JBL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLS or JBL?
JBL has the lower trailing P/E at 30.7, versus 38.6 for CLS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Celestica or Jabil?
Jabil pays a dividend yielding 0.11%, while Celestica does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Celestica and Jabil in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.