Celestica (CLS) vs Hubbell (HUBB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Celestica (CLS) has outperformed Hubbell (HUBB) over the past year, gaining 56.3% versus a gain of 15.1%. Over five years, CLS leads with a +3886.8% price change compared with +152.5% for HUBB. Celestica is the larger company by market cap ($46.38 billion vs $25.12 billion), about 1.8 times the size.
On valuation, Celestica trades at a lower forward P/E (18.7x vs 20.7x for Hubbell). Hubbell pays a dividend yielding 1.17%, while Celestica does not currently pay one. Hubbell converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.2% versus 6.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLS | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $367.75 | $475.41 |
| Market cap | $46.38B | $25.12B |
| 1-day change | -1.03% | 0.00% |
| YTD return | +25.70% | +7.05% |
| 1-year return | +56.26% | +15.13% |
| 5-year return | +3886.80% | +152.47% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 38.19 | 28.15 |
| Forward P/E | 18.71 | 20.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $9.63 | $16.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $5.58 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.39B | $5.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +28.46% | +3.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $832.50M | $887.10M |
| Gross margin | 12.06% | 35.32% |
| Operating margin | 8.40% | 20.68% |
| Net margin | 6.72% | 15.18% |
| 52-week high | $474.03 | $565.50 |
| 52-week low | $238.23 | $403.82 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.42% | -15.93% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.87% | +17.92% |
| Average volume | 2.51M | 510.70K |
| Shares outstanding | 126.11M | 52.83M |
| Employees | 23,803 | 19,400 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CLS has outperformed HUBB by 41.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Celestica trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.2x vs 28.1x trailing P/E).
- Hubbell offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.00%).
- Hubbell is more profitable, keeping 15.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.7 cents for Celestica.
- Celestica grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+28.46% vs +3.84%).
About Celestica
CLS stock →Celestica Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides supply chain solutions in Asia, North America, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Advanced Technology Solutions, and Connectivity and Cloud Solutions.
Technology · Electrical Products · 23,803 employees
About Hubbell
HUBB stock →Hubbell Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells electrical and utility solutions in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments, Electrical Solutions and Utility Solutions.
Technology · Electrical Products · 19,400 employees
CLS vs HUBB FAQ
Which is bigger, Celestica or Hubbell?
Celestica (CLS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $46.38B compared with $25.12B for Hubbell (HUBB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLS or HUBB?
CLS returned +56.26% over the past 12 months, compared with +15.13% for HUBB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLS or HUBB?
HUBB has the lower trailing P/E at 28.1, versus 38.2 for CLS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Celestica or Hubbell?
Hubbell pays a dividend yielding 1.17%, while Celestica does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Celestica and Hubbell in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.