MetaCap

Core Molding Technologies (CMT) vs Entegris (ENTG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Entegris (ENTG) has outperformed Core Molding Technologies (CMT) over the past year, gaining 80.2% versus a gain of 23.4%. Over five years, CMT leads with a +100.4% price change compared with +28.0% for ENTG. Entegris is the larger company by market cap ($24.78 billion vs $203.6 million), about 121.7 times the size.

On valuation, Core Molding Technologies trades at a lower forward P/E (13.4x vs 32.2x for Entegris). Entegris pays a dividend yielding 0.25%, while Core Molding Technologies does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CMT+23.39%ENTG+80.21%
+106%+37%-32%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CMT+104.89%ENTG+37.25%
+163%+53%-57%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CMT versus ENTG key metrics
MetricCMTENTG
Share price$23.01$162.19
Market cap$203.62M$24.78B
1-day change-0.17%-2.48%
YTD return+14.96%+97.41%
1-year return+23.39%+80.21%
5-year return+100.43%+27.96%
P/E ratio (TTM)27.0781.10
Forward P/E13.3832.25
EPS (TTM)$0.85$2.00
Dividend yield0.00%0.25%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.40
Revenue (latest FY)—$3.20B
Revenue growth (YoY)—-1.38%
Net income (latest FY)—$235.60M
Gross margin—44.42%
Operating margin—14.26%
Net margin—7.37%
52-week high$28.69$186.94
52-week low$16.60$67.97
Distance from 52-week high-19.80%-13.24%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+30.38%+6.89%
Average volume29.90K2.34M
Shares outstanding8.85M152.80M
Employees1,2397,700
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryPlastic ProductsPlastic Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Entegris is about 121.7 times larger than Core Molding Technologies by market value ($24.78B vs $203.62M).
  • ENTG has outperformed CMT by 56.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Entegris trades at a higher earnings multiple (81.1x vs 27.1x trailing P/E).

About Core Molding Technologies

CMT stock →

Core Molding Technologies, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a molder of thermoplastic and thermoset structural products in the United States, Mexico, Canada, and internationally. The company offers a range of manufacturing processes, such as sheet molding compound compression molding, direct long fiber thermoplastic compression molding, vacuum resin transfer compression molding, structural foam and web injection molding, reaction injection molding, hand lay-up, and spray-up processes.

Industrials · Plastic Products · 1,239 employees

About Entegris

ENTG stock →

Entegris, Inc. provides advanced materials and process solutions for the semiconductor and other high-technology industries in North America, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, China, Europe, and Southeast Asia.

Industrials · Plastic Products · 7,700 employees

CMT vs ENTG FAQ

Which is bigger, Core Molding Technologies or Entegris?

Entegris (ENTG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $24.78B compared with $203.62M for Core Molding Technologies (CMT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CMT or ENTG?

ENTG returned +80.21% over the past 12 months, compared with +23.39% for CMT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CMT or ENTG?

CMT has the lower trailing P/E at 27.1, versus 81.1 for ENTG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Core Molding Technologies or Entegris?

Entegris pays a dividend yielding 0.25%, while Core Molding Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Core Molding Technologies and Entegris in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Plastic Products industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons