CNA Financial (CNA) vs Everest Group (EG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Everest Group (EG) has outperformed CNA Financial (CNA) over the past year, losing 0.7% versus a loss of 2.2%. Over five years, EG leads with a +30.1% price change compared with +1.1% for CNA. Everest Group is the larger company by market cap ($14.03 billion vs $12.49 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while CNA Financial is growing revenue faster (+5.0% vs +1.2%).
On valuation, Everest Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.1x vs 9.6x for CNA Financial). CNA Financial offers the higher dividend yield (4.07% vs 2.19%). Everest Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.1% versus 8.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CNA | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $46.16 | $365.94 |
| Market cap | $12.49B | $14.03B |
| 1-day change | +0.65% | +1.02% |
| YTD return | -3.94% | +6.76% |
| 1-year return | -2.22% | -0.70% |
| 5-year return | +1.12% | +30.11% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.17 | 7.74 |
| Forward P/E | 9.62 | 6.11 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.54 | $47.28 |
| Dividend yield | 4.07% | 2.19% |
| Annual dividend | $1.88 | $8.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $14.99B | $17.50B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.04% | +1.24% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.28B | $1.59B |
| Net margin | 8.53% | 9.09% |
| 52-week high | $55.71 | $401.07 |
| 52-week low | $41.53 | $302.44 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -17.14% | -8.76% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +6.15% | +12.26% |
| Average volume | 489.40K | 361.40K |
| Shares outstanding | 270.60M | 38.34M |
| Employees | 6,600 | 3,064 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CNA Financial trades at a higher earnings multiple (10.2x vs 7.7x trailing P/E).
- CNA Financial offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.07% vs 2.19%).
About CNA Financial
CNA stock →CNA Financial Corporation, an insurance holding company, primarily provides commercial property and casualty insurance products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, and internationally. It operates through Specialty, Commercial, International, and Life & Group segments.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 6,600 employees
About Everest Group
EG stock →Everest Group, Ltd., together with subsidiaries, provides reinsurance and insurance products in the United States, Europe, and internationally. It operates in two segment, Insurance and Reinsurance.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 3,064 employees
CNA vs EG FAQ
Which is bigger, CNA Financial or Everest Group?
Everest Group (EG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.03B compared with $12.49B for CNA Financial (CNA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNA or EG?
EG returned -0.70% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.22% for CNA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CNA or EG?
EG has the lower trailing P/E at 7.7, versus 10.2 for CNA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNA Financial or Everest Group?
CNA Financial has the higher yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.19% for Everest Group.
Are CNA Financial and Everest Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.