Vita Coco (COCO) vs Monster Beverage (MNST)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Monster Beverage (MNST) has outperformed Vita Coco (COCO) over the past year, gaining 25.8% versus a gain of 18.4%. Monster Beverage is the larger company by market cap ($84.00 billion vs $2.93 billion), about 28.7 times the size, while Vita Coco is growing revenue faster (+18.2% vs +10.7%). On valuation, Vita Coco trades at a lower forward P/E (21.6x vs 32.8x for Monster Beverage).
Monster Beverage converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.0% versus 11.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | COCO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $50.65 | $42.88 |
| Market cap | $2.93B | $84.00B |
| 1-day change | -7.03% | -0.86% |
| YTD return | -4.45% | +11.86% |
| 1-year return | +18.44% | +25.84% |
| 5-year return | — | +100.42% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 30.15 | 40.07 |
| Forward P/E | 21.65 | 32.78 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.68 | $1.07 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $609.78M | $8.29B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.17% | +10.70% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $71.32M | $1.91B |
| Gross margin | 36.50% | 55.85% |
| Operating margin | 13.53% | 29.17% |
| Net margin | 11.70% | 22.97% |
| 52-week high | $85.83 | $50.17 |
| 52-week low | $38.07 | $32.94 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -40.99% | -14.53% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +57.75% | +16.65% |
| Average volume | 1.18M | 10.49M |
| Shares outstanding | 57.86M | 1.96B |
| Employees | 336 | 5,773 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Beverages (Production/Distribution) | Beverages (Production/Distribution) |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Monster Beverage is about 28.7 times larger than Vita Coco by market value ($84.00B vs $2.93B).
- Monster Beverage trades at a higher earnings multiple (40.1x vs 30.1x trailing P/E).
- Monster Beverage is more profitable, keeping 23.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 11.7 cents for Vita Coco.
- Vita Coco grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.17% vs +10.70%).
About Vita Coco
COCO stock →The Vita Coco Company, Inc. develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes coconut water products under the Vita Coco brand name in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 336 employees
About Monster Beverage
MNST stock →Monster Beverage Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in development, marketing, sale, and distribution of energy drink beverages and concentrates in the United States and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Monster Energy Drinks, Strategic Brands, Alcohol Brands, and Other.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 5,773 employees
COCO vs MNST FAQ
Which is bigger, Vita Coco or Monster Beverage?
Monster Beverage (MNST) is larger, with a market capitalization of $84.00B compared with $2.93B for Vita Coco (COCO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, COCO or MNST?
MNST returned +25.84% over the past 12 months, compared with +18.44% for COCO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, COCO or MNST?
COCO has the lower trailing P/E at 30.1, versus 40.1 for MNST. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Vita Coco and Monster Beverage in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Beverages (Production/Distribution) industry within the Consumer Staples sector.