Americold Realty (COLD) vs Independence Realty (IRT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Americold Realty (COLD) has outperformed Independence Realty (IRT) over the past year, gaining 2.3% versus a loss of 11.0%. Over five years, IRT leads with a -32.2% price change compared with -55.0% for COLD. Americold Realty is the larger company by market cap ($3.92 billion vs $3.49 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Independence Realty is growing revenue faster (+2.8% vs -2.4%).
Americold Realty offers the higher dividend yield (6.74% vs 4.78%). Independence Realty converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus -4.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | COLD | IRT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.65 | $14.44 |
| Market cap | $3.92B | $3.49B |
| 1-day change | -1.52% | -1.97% |
| YTD return | +6.14% | -17.39% |
| 1-year return | +2.32% | -11.03% |
| 5-year return | -55.04% | -32.24% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 80.22 |
| Forward P/E | — | 180.50 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.59 | $0.18 |
| Dividend yield | 6.74% | 4.78% |
| Annual dividend | $0.92 | $0.69 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.60B | $657.70M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.43% | +2.76% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-114.55M | $56.56M |
| Gross margin | 32.26% | — |
| Operating margin | 0.28% | — |
| Net margin | -4.40% | 8.60% |
| 52-week high | $16.88 | $17.79 |
| 52-week low | $10.10 | $14.34 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -19.14% | -18.83% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +20.00% | +33.45% |
| Average volume | 3.68M | 3.15M |
| Shares outstanding | 285.48M | 235.74M |
| Employees | 12,690 | 904 |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Real Estate Investment Trusts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- COLD has outperformed IRT by 13.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Americold Realty offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.74% vs 4.78%).
- Independence Realty is more profitable, keeping 8.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -4.4 cents for Americold Realty.
- Independence Realty grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+2.76% vs -2.43%).
About Americold Realty
COLD stock →Americold is a global leader in temperature-controlled logistics and real estate, supporting the safe, efficient movement of food worldwide. With 224 operating facilities across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and South America totaling approximately 1.4 billion refrigerated cubic feet, the firm connect producers, processors, distributors, and retailers.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 12,690 employees
About Independence Realty
IRT stock →Independence Realty Trust, Inc., an S&P 400 MidCap Company, is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates multifamily communities across non-gateway U.S. markets.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 904 employees
COLD vs IRT FAQ
Which is bigger, Americold Realty or Independence Realty?
Americold Realty (COLD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.92B compared with $3.49B for Independence Realty (IRT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, COLD or IRT?
COLD returned +2.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -11.03% for IRT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Americold Realty or Independence Realty?
Americold Realty has the higher yield at 6.74%, compared with 4.78% for Independence Realty.
Are Americold Realty and Independence Realty in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.