Columbia Sportswear (COLM) vs G-III Apparel Group LTD. (GIII)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Columbia Sportswear (COLM) has outperformed G-III Apparel Group LTD. (GIII) over the past year, gaining 8.6% versus a gain of 0.5%. Over five years, GIII leads with a -4.3% price change compared with -41.2% for COLM. Columbia Sportswear is the larger company by market cap ($2.89 billion vs $1.16 billion), about 2.5 times the size.
On valuation, G-III Apparel Group LTD. trades at a lower forward P/E (11.3x vs 13.5x for Columbia Sportswear). Columbia Sportswear offers the higher dividend yield (2.12% vs 1.11%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | COLM | GIII |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.53 | $26.95 |
| Market cap | $2.89B | $1.16B |
| 1-day change | -1.60% | +0.63% |
| YTD return | +2.61% | -6.94% |
| 1-year return | +8.65% | +0.52% |
| 5-year return | -41.25% | -4.33% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.99 | 8.78 |
| Forward P/E | 13.50 | 11.25 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.77 | $3.07 |
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | 1.11% |
| Annual dividend | $1.20 | $0.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.40B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.85% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $177.22M | — |
| Gross margin | 50.53% | — |
| Operating margin | 6.09% | — |
| Net margin | 5.22% | — |
| 52-week high | $69.06 | $37.54 |
| 52-week low | $47.47 | $24.61 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.14% | -28.21% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.53% | +28.94% |
| Average volume | 668.57K | 613.95K |
| Shares outstanding | 51.19M | 42.88M |
| Employees | 9,620 | 3,400 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Apparel Manufacturing | Apparel Manufacturing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Columbia Sportswear is about 2.5 times larger than G-III Apparel Group LTD. by market value ($2.89B vs $1.16B).
- Columbia Sportswear trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.0x vs 8.8x trailing P/E).
- Columbia Sportswear offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.12% vs 1.11%).
About Columbia Sportswear
COLM stock →Columbia Sportswear Company, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the design, development, marketing, and distribution of outdoor, active, and lifestyle products in the United States, Latin America, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Canada. It provides apparel, accessories, and equipment for hiking, trail running, snow, fishing, hunting, and outdoor activities.
Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Manufacturing · 9,620 employees
About G-III Apparel Group LTD.
GIII stock →G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. designs, sources, and markets women's and men's apparel in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Cyclical · Apparel Manufacturing · 3,400 employees
COLM vs GIII FAQ
Which is bigger, Columbia Sportswear or G-III Apparel Group LTD.?
Columbia Sportswear (COLM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.89B compared with $1.16B for G-III Apparel Group LTD. (GIII).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, COLM or GIII?
COLM returned +8.65% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.52% for GIII (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, COLM or GIII?
GIII has the lower trailing P/E at 8.8, versus 15.0 for COLM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Columbia Sportswear or G-III Apparel Group LTD.?
Columbia Sportswear has the higher yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.11% for G-III Apparel Group LTD..
Are Columbia Sportswear and G-III Apparel Group LTD. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel Manufacturing industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.