Core Scientific (CORZ) vs Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Core Scientific (CORZ) has outperformed Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) over the past year, losing 12.4% versus a loss of 43.9%. Figure Technology Solutions is the larger company by market cap ($6.19 billion vs $4.94 billion), about 1.3 times the size. On valuation, Figure Technology Solutions trades at a lower forward P/E (14.6x vs 94.4x for Core Scientific).
Figure Technology Solutions converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 26.4% versus -90.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CORZ | FIGR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.36 | $27.60 |
| Market cap | $4.94B | $6.19B |
| 1-day change | -3.64% | -0.29% |
| YTD return | +5.49% | -32.42% |
| 1-year return | -12.38% | -43.87% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 29.68 |
| Forward P/E | 94.37 | 14.60 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.25 | $0.93 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $319.02M | $506.87M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -37.53% | +48.69% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-288.62M | $133.86M |
| Gross margin | 11.88% | — |
| Operating margin | -76.98% | 23.19% |
| Net margin | -90.47% | 26.41% |
| 52-week high | $30.46 | $78.00 |
| 52-week low | $13.36 | $24.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -49.57% | -64.62% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +115.17% | +92.03% |
| Average volume | 11.91M | 4.20M |
| Shares outstanding | 321.34M | 185.67M |
| Employees | 325 | 602 |
| Sector | Finance | Financial Services |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Capital Markets |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CORZ has outperformed FIGR by 31.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Figure Technology Solutions is more profitable, keeping 26.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -90.5 cents for Core Scientific.
- Figure Technology Solutions grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+48.69% vs -37.53%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Core Scientific in Finance and Figure Technology Solutions in Financial Services.
About Core Scientific
CORZ stock →Core Scientific, Inc. provides infrastructure for high-density colocation services and digital asset mining in the United States.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 325 employees
About Figure Technology Solutions
FIGR stock →Figure Technology Solutions, Inc., a financial technology company, provides blockchain-based products and solutions in the United States. The company offers a suite of blockchain-based solutions for its marketplaces, including lending, trading, and investing activities in areas, such as consumer credit and digital assets.
Financial Services · Capital Markets · 602 employees
CORZ vs FIGR FAQ
Which is bigger, Core Scientific or Figure Technology Solutions?
Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.19B compared with $4.94B for Core Scientific (CORZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CORZ or FIGR?
CORZ returned -12.38% over the past 12 months, compared with -43.87% for FIGR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Core Scientific and Figure Technology Solutions in the same industry?
No. Core Scientific is in the Finance sector, while Figure Technology Solutions is in Financial Services.